I must make a confession: I did not fill out a bracket. Honest. I do watch the NCAA tournament, but I do it more in this decade of my life as a primer for the NBA Draft in June – so that I am properly familiar with all of the lottery picks who are from the USA. Then, from naturally camping out on the couch, a story line or 3 will jump out at me during the tournament, and by the Final 4, I am going crazy over the tournament. I just don’t need my brackets or to hear about your brackets (no offense) to fall in love with the annual March tradition.
Anyway, when watching it every year, I try to see who the experts like for the draft, and then see if I see what they see. According to about 50 mock drafts , it would appear that there is NO question who the #1 pick in the draft is going to be:
OU’s big, strong Blake Griffin.

He obviously is a special talent. He obviously is a man-against-boys in the college game. He obviously will be a strong player with a long NBA Career.
But, #1 overall?
#1 overall is something I try to reserve for LeBron, Dwight Howard, Tim Duncan, Yao Ming, and Shaquille O’Neal. Heck, Derrick Rose seems to be a true #1. I guess, I want my #1 overall pick that will be granted to the winner of the NBA Lottery to be a guy who leads his team by being an absolute match-up nightmare. A guy the opponent has “no answer” for.
Of course, there are other years. Just ask Milwaukee about Andrew Bogut being their #1. Toronto’s life likely didn’t change to much when they won the “Andrea Bargnani” Lottery. And heck, Greg Oden may not have quite made all of Portland’s dreams come true.
See, in the NBA, it isn’t just about winning the lottery. It is about winning the lottery in the proper year.
So, now back to big Blake.
I love his game. But, it seems to largely revolve around his more-than-superior skills in the paint, that are mostly due to his insane strength and remarkable hands. He is listed at 6’10, which we generally find about draft time that it has been enhanced by an inch or so.
Mitch Lawrence discussed this topic last week :
Consensus No. 1 pick averages 22 points on 63% shooting with 14 boards a game. “Even if he bombs in the tournament, he’ll still go No. 1,” said one scout. “He’s that much better than anybody else.” Griffin is being compared to Utah’s Carlos Boozer, but with more athleticism. Only red flag: Previous problems with both knees, including surgery on right knee. Listed at 6-10.
I am always worried about guys his size who make their game by being bulls-in-the-china shop. Does that carry into the NBA? Carlos Boozer? What about Corliss Williamson? Former #1 overall pick Larry Johnson? I think you would have to be pleased to get Grand-Mama in the fold. But would I compare his career with Duncan or LeBron? I don’t think so.
College Basketball can be the great deceiver sometimes. Joe Smith was the #1 overall pick in 1995. Christian Laettner was arguably the greatest NCAA player of his generation when he left Duke. Donyell Marshall was dominant at UConn. I remember when some thought Marcus Camby was going to be the big man that would change a franchise after doing what he did at UMass. Was anybody as great in March as Danny Manning? All had NBA Careers and likely don’t lack for money, but did any of them come close to their draft day promise?
So, when Blake gets to the league, will he be able to find match-ups where he has a huge strength advantage and be the alpha-male on a fabulous team? Or will he be a great 2nd or 3rd banana on a team where he averages a 15 point, 10 rebound career? Nothing wrong with that, right? But, #1 overall?
Michael Beasley went #2 last year to Miami, after being a 6’10 destroyer at Kansas State in his only year. Unlike Griffin, Beasley would routinely head outside the 3-point stripe. So far, nobody is close to arguing that Chicago took the wrong guy at #1 when they grabbed Rose.
Really, this may have nothing to do with Blake Griffin. It may have more to do with the year he entered the draft (we assume). For instance, once upon a time, Chan Ho Park was the best pitcher available in the free agent pool. Even in the ugliest town in a America, they still have a beauty pageant, right?
He appears to be the best of the bunch. Only Spain’s young, small point guard Ricky Rubio is talked about as a #1 consideration if you don’t take Blake Griffin.
I just wonder if that makes this a bad draft year to win the lottery. I will continue to examine Blake’s game this week in the Sweet 16.
Like I said, I like his game translating in the NBA. I just don’t love it. NBA Superstar? I just can’t figure him out yet.
Incidentally, according to this mock draft , the Mavs grab UNC’s Ty Lawson to help play Point…Interesting. And in the Top 5 on many of these mock drafts is Brandon Jennings. His story is incredibly unique and he is featured on the current episode of HBO’s Real Sports. I would advise you to check your local listings and take a look at that if the Draft interests you.
Rubio has a massive buyout that is likely going to keep any NBA team from drafting him.
Griffin has to be the #1 pick, there’s really not another legit option.
It’s all about options, buddy.
Being an Okie, Bob, I’ve loved watching Griffin this year. But I’ve shared the same concerns. One thing about the Michigan game I liked, though, was how he handled the double-teams. He split them with his incredible first step, or passed out of them well. Crucial in the NBA. But the guy I fear that he’ll be like is another supremely talented power forward who went No. 1, Kenyon Martin. Great on the break, very athletic, heart of gold, but will just never have the outside shot to be a crunch-time guy. You’re right: that would not be my first choice if I were constructing a profile of a No. 1 pick. But who else is out there besides Rubio?
Spot on, Eric. It just might be a Chan Ho Park year. I have read that Griffin would have been at the end of the Top 5 if he was in last year’s draft. Still really good, just not franchise changing. Rubio seems like a pretty big project, and Dirk is right about the buyout.
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/writers/chris_mannix/03/18/rubio/
As a guy who loves the OKC Thunder’s vision and Durant, I think getting Blake there would be really cool.
Rubio is listed at 6’4″, which, even if that’s exaggerated by an inch or so, is not small for a point guard.
Tyler- My impression was that he was small as in very skinny and very raw at the Olympics last summer, although I certainly am no scout when it comes to projecting a 17-year old (which I think he was last summer).
Blake would be best served going to OKC and running second banana to Kevin Durant
I agree with your argument, it seems that the same thing happens very frequently in the NFL as well. Sometimes you end up with Peyton Manning or Orlando Pace and sometimes you end up with Tim Couch or Ki-Jana Carter.
I do not agree with your following statement.
“And heck, Greg Oden may not quite made all of Portland’s dreams come true.”
Obviously time will tell, but Durant looks to have the better career ahead than Oden so I can see where Bug was coming from
I don’t care where BG get’s drafted. I just hope they stop showing his mom at every break in action.
I don’t think Griffin will be an NBA superstar, but he’ll have a solid career. He’s quick, agile and strong. His work ethic will serve him well. If he can develop a jump shot, that will only increase his ability to play both forward positions.
Was this article written previously? Like last year? It seems like this is one of the sportswriters favorite tricks, dig up column from same period as last year and insert new name for this year. Update role of #1 from prior year. While all the prior information stays the same.
The article does not seem to enhance or advance the discussion. But to act as filler.
Corey, that’s why its a blog, not an article. A blog is just one’s thoughts on a particular subject. I guarantee you the Sturminator wasn’t assigned to write on Blake Griffin’s potential as the #1 overall pick, it’s just what Bob was thinking about, put on the canvas of the world wide web for sports fanatics to see.
But hey, I can link to you several hundred more blogs for you to complain about how you’ve heard that story before if you like…
Let me know, I’ll start writing down my bookmarks for you…
What’s the difference in Griffin’s game and Amare Stoudemire’s game? He’s as athletic and a better ball handler. Would you consider Stoudemire a game changer?
bigskinny,
Before or after the microfracture surgery?
Rossometown,
No need for bookmarks, I just need to skip trivial “blogs”.
B Grif. seems to take quite a few shots…have to wonder about his durability. He reminds me of a pre-injury McDyess. If he can stay healthy (big if) I think at worst he’ll be a 15-10 guy. Despite the big hands, he actually has a soft shot, which I think he can develop into a consistent 8 footer.
Check out the “Snake Pit”:
I think Griffin could be GREAT as a pro. The durability questions with his knees is a non-issue at this point…but that concussion situation was really odd. The questions raised about his shot or comparing him with Beasley aren’t really justified. The offense flows through him primarily posting up on the block and he isn’t asked to shoot from range. If you listen to anyone who watches OU’s warmups, the guy has range – that he doesn’t have to use it yet in college doesn’t mean he doesn’t have it. All that said, I think if OKC gets him a la Ewing to the Knicks (thank you Mr. Stern) they could pose a really dominant twosome with the right pieces placed around them.
is Yao Ming really a true #1 overall pick? and looking back, the first round of that 2002 draft is brutal
What a shameful plug Cobra! hope the HS girls slaughter you. As for Griffin, he will be nothing more than a 10 pt/10 reb in the NBA. Which isn’t anything to slouch about, but I agree with Sturm in the fact those aren’t #1 pick numbers. OKC should grab him, and he can be Durants inside body.
Nip, Nip
Bob – Why ride the fence on Blake? The impression you leave is that you don’t think he’ll amount to much in the NBA.
Most everyone who has played him says you are wrong.
North Carolina coach Roy Willliams was certainly impressed by Blake Griffin’s play on Sunday.
“He’s a load,” Williams said. “Please don’t make this to be a comparison — [but] he is LeBron James-like. He’s got such a package of strength, explosiveness, touch, power. You know, it’s hard to match that. In person when you’re sitting on that bench, it even looks more awesome than it does when I’m watching it on TV.”
I say – his game hasn’t been developed by the NBA level coaching staff. If he improves his FT% by 10% – and develops a mid range jumper – he will be lethal.
Let’s see where he is at in 3 years.
I believe by saying he will be a great #2 or #3 stud on an NBA team is not an insult. Like I said, Larry Johnson had a great career, the question is, is he a true #1 on a good team? Is he Dwight Howard? Is he Lebron? Is he Wade? Is he even Dirk? Is he a top 10 player in the league?
That is the question.
I understand your point. It’s just when someone with the skins like Roy Williams says that about a player – well, let say he wasn’t comparing him with a #2 or #3 guy.
If the lottery pick has to compare with Howard,Lebron and Wade to be a true #1 – that’s a pretty tall order.
FWIW – I think he is the second coming of Karl Malone. Who less MJ would have had a title or two himself.