D

Live Blog Feed


Tom Hicks May Sell Up To 49 Percent of Rangers and Stars

SURPRISE, Ariz. - Rangers/Stars owner Tom Hicks on Wednesday confirmed InsideCorner’s report that he is seeking investors to buy a significant chunk of his U.S. sports operations.

Hicks currently controls 95 percent of the teams, but said he is willing to relinquish up to 49 percent of the Rangers and Stars. He said few major market clubs are completely controlled by one owner.

“I look at it as a way to improve things in a bad economy,” Hicks said. “It’s something we’ve been looking at quietly for the last couple of months. I don’t think it’s a big deal.”

Hicks said the deal would not have any impact on the teams’ payrolls.

But he is looking at adding some heavy hitters – and some big time arms. He acknowledged that he’d like for club president Nolan Ryan to get “more involved.” Ryan recently hosted his minor league franchise ownership partner Don Sanderes in Surprise.

And Wednesday, Hicks hosted Dallas real estate investor Ray Washburne, who is in the process of closing a $150 million deal to buy Highland Park Village shopping center.

Hicks said, however, he is not seeking an investment from former U.S. President George W. Bush, a former Rangers partner and current Hicks neighbor.

“The guys I’m looking for have really, really deep pockets,” Hicks said. “We just want [President Bush] to be a fan and show up at as many games as he can.”

Hicks said he anticipates retaining between 51 and 60 percent of the two teams. Selling off 40 percent of the Rangers alone could be worth $200 million. Hicks declined to discuss his estimated value of the club, but it could exceed $500 million. According to Forbes magazine, the Rangers were worth $412 million last year and ranked 16th of the 30 MLB franchises. San Diego, which was just sold for more than $500 million, was ranked 19th in the same survey.

Any deal for part of the Rangers or Stars would not include any portion of Hicks’ 50-percent control of Liverpool Football Club, the English Premier League soccer team in which he shares ownership with Montreal Canadiens owner George Gillett. Locked in a standoff with his partner, Hicks can’t afford to sell any portion of the team or risk turning himself into a minority owner.

Pursuing a deal for parts of the Rangers and Stars may simply return Hicks to the status he held when he first purchased the Rangers in 1998 to go along with his control of the Stars. Hicks said at that time that he held only 55 percent of the two teams.

Bookmark and Share
8 Comments to “Tom Hicks May Sell Up To 49 Percent of Rangers and Stars”
  • Little O

    With Gillett suddenly wanting to sell the Canadiens it looks like a showdown is afoot between the two for control of Liverpool and it’s construction of a new stadium.

  • Brandon B

    He is going to pocket around $200 million and it won’t affect payroll? I can understand that with the Stars since there is a salary cap, but with the Rangers, it is borderline negligence. I would hope to see the Rangers at least move into the top 15 in salary which would about double their payroll next year.

    I guess Hicks has to sell off parts of the teams to make up for the empty seats because of the poor performance in Arlington in particular.

  • Evan Grant

    @Brandon B: Hicks’ perspective is that any additional cash won’t impact the payroll because he says he’d dish out for a big-time player right now if he believed the Rangers were one player away. He maintains the payroll will still be player-specific. But I also think it has to make digging a little deeper into those pockets easier with extra cash reserves.

  • robert_d_wilfong

    I got 20 bucks.

  • EdC

    I feel like helping Rob Wilfong along with this. I’ll email the folks at the institutional trusts at Berkshire Hathaway (the part not subject to their stock convolutions) and ask for $333 million to offer Hicks for 59% of the clubs $442 million valuation. Tom makes a tidy 20% on the deal, the club gets cash healthy, and wilfong can advise on one matter per year. Deal?

  • NCRF

    If Hicks will not be essentially the sole owner, will he need to get consensus from the other investors when it comes time to hand out big bucks on a free agent, or will having the majority stake of 51% give total control of those types of decisions.

  • Brandon B

    Evan, so he says, but then again he has been saying that for years. I guess since they are continually 3 to 4 starting pitchers away from having a real rotation, Hicks won’t ever have to dish out the big bucks.

  • Mrs. Silence Dogood

    Our team’s owner needs the cash either to replenish his reserves or for another investment. Why else would he sell in a down economy?