Today’s Feature Email goes a little something like this:
Dear Sports Sturm,I Noticed the Rangers are currently playing .600 ball in spring training. If they were to win at that pace that would mean a 97 win season. I was curious how previous Rangers spring trainings have translated to the regular season.
James Gilliam
At 18-13, the Rangers are now sitting at .581 baseball since James wrote me, but you get the idea. So, is there a correlation between the spring training records and the regular season accomplishments?
Without looking, I would say absolutely not. But, let’s take a look:
The 5 best Win Percentage seasons in Ranger History were the following with the spring training records shown on the far right:
| Year | Reg Season | Win % | Spring Rec |
| 1999 | 95-67 | .586 | 14-14-1 |
| 1977 | 94-68 | .580 | 12-14 |
| 1996 | 90-72 | .556 | 19-11 |
| 2004 | 89-73 | .549 | 12-18 |
| 1998 | 88-74 | .543 | 21-10 |
Hmm. A few good springs and a few bad ones. Not sure I see any correlations.
According to the Rangers media guide, it appears that 2 of the best spring trainings ever were 1998 and 1996, which also were 2 of the 3 years in Ranger history where they won the division.
The 5 most successful spring trainings (measured by wins) were 1995, 1998, 1992, 1996, and 2002. So, for the sake of fun, how did they do in the regular season those years? Please keep in mind that in 1995, spring training was extra long (almost 40 games) because they went through the “1st” spring training with replacement players and then the “2nd” was when the “real” players settled and returned to work by rushing through an impromptu spring.
| Year | Spring Rec | Season Rec | Win % |
| 1995 | 26-12-1 | 74-70 | .514 |
| 1998 | 21-10 | 88-74 | .543 |
| 1992 | 19-12 | 77-85 | .475 |
| 1996 | 19-11 | 90-72 | .556 |
| 2002 | 18-13-1 | 72-90 | .444 |
Once again, 3 seasons over .500, and 2 seasons under .500. It is starting to look like there is no connection whatsoever.
Finally, what about the 5 worst seasons (Win Percentage) in Rangers history? What kind of springs did they have in those seasons?
| Year | Reg Season | Win % | Spring Rec |
| 1972 | 54-100 | .351 | 11-14-1 |
| 1973 | 57-105 | .352 | 8-15 |
| 1985 | 62-99 | .385 | 10-14 |
| 1982 | 64-98 | .395 | 15-10-1 |
| 1984 | 69-92 | .429 | 12-11-1 |
2 winning springs, 3 losing. Surely, in 1972 and 1973, those teams were bad no matter when they played, but otherwise, the randomness is loud and clear.
From a Rangers historical perspective, James, there appears to be nearly zero connection between the results of the 30 games played in the spring time, and the 162 that are played for real.
I am sure there are very important things going on at Spring Training every year, but the results aren’t one of them.
For many of us, that answer was always what we thought, but now the evidence seems to bear it out.
If you’re really going to study this question you’d need a MUCH larger sample to draw any useful conclusions from.
Luckily, ACTA sports did a study last year looking at playoff teams from 12 seasons (1996-2007). There was some correlation between a ST record above .500 and playoff appearances, with playoff teams finishing the spring with a winning record 69% of the time. Web address:
http://www.actasports.com/sow.php?id=165
I should add that even that sample isn’t very large, but on my lunch minute at work I don’t have time to search for more studies.
There’s just too much crazy crap going on in ST for the ST record to have a direct correlation with the regular season record.
-players who won’t contribute to the ML team in the regular season
-lineup constructions and defensive alignments you won’t see in the regular season
-ML pitchers trying pitch selections and situational things they wouldn’t do in the regular season.
If you limit the ST record to the last third or half of games (when the ML rotation and lineup is getting narrowed down and making an increasing contribution), then *maybe* you’d start to see something…
Regardless of the record, all I hope to see from spring training is players getting their work in, pitchers increasing their pitch counts, and no (or few) injuries. That is a successful spring training.
That was interesting . I admire your style that you put into your post . Please do continue with more similar to this.