Comments on: Rangers/Stars Owner Tom Hicks: “We Want The Banks To Be Reasonable”

By: Hal Aney

Hal Aney — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 08:02:47 +0000

following the blog, great stuff!

By: Charise Previte

Charise Previte — Sun, 07 Mar 2010 09:37:13 +0000

Lots of Fantastic information in your blogpost, I favorited your blog post so I can visit again in the near future, Thanks

By: renting garden tools

renting garden tools — Fri, 18 Dec 2009 23:25:10 +0000

It appears that you’ve put a good amount of effort into your article and I demand a lot more of these on the web these days. I sincerely got a kick out of your post. I do not have a bunch to to say in reply, I only wanted to register to say remarkable work.

By: Dallas Blog, Daily News, Dallas Politics, Opinion, and Commentary FrontBurner Blog D Magazine » Blog Archive » Wall Street Journal Looks at Tom Hicks’ Finances

Tue, 14 Apr 2009 14:49:44 +0000

[...] isn’t really news. Tom Hicks first spoke to our own Evan Grant about why he was defaulting on some of his loans. But seeing it all laid out in the WSJ (sub only) [...]

By: Liverpool Financial Trouble? | Soccerati

Liverpool Financial Trouble? | Soccerati — Mon, 06 Apr 2009 18:03:01 +0000

[...] in fine and dandy standing. But everywhere else — with his American sports holdings — Hicks is navigating through what can only be a prickly financial field. Posted by Danieldinho on April 6, 2009 at 1:02 [...]

By: ed

ed — Mon, 06 Apr 2009 17:49:01 +0000

So I guess Hicks would have no problem if Josh Hamilton and Hank Blalock decided not to play today and said “Let’s be reasonable.”

By: Ned

Ned — Mon, 06 Apr 2009 08:18:27 +0000

I absolutely despise Tom Hicks, and I speak from two perspectives. He is a sorry s.o.b. one-on-one and towards the public.

By: Jeff

Jeff — Sat, 04 Apr 2009 19:09:07 +0000

Leverage, leverage, leverage. It works so well in the fat years, but it bites you bad in the lean ones, eh Mr. Hicks?

By: Mark

Mark — Sat, 04 Apr 2009 14:56:29 +0000

If Tom Hicks bought the Rangers for 285 million and the Stars for 85 million what did he spend the other 155 million on? After 10 years he hasn’t paid down any principle?

By: No Fan

No Fan — Sat, 04 Apr 2009 08:25:55 +0000

Hicks has never cared about either team — just money. When he bought the Stars, he bragged it was a real estate deal not a sports deal. As a result, Dallas has a new stadium, largely subsidized by taxpayers.

I wonder how his $400 million+ “blank check” hedge fund is really doing. It’s only fitting that Dubya will throw out the first pitch on Monday. Maybe it’s time for Tom Hicks to “catch” instead of pitching with OPM.