The Top 25: Ranking The Rangers Roster

First pitch of the 2009 season is less than 15 hours from this moment, still plenty of time to preview the season. Let’s take a quick look at the roster from top to bottom. Below, you’ll find our rankings of the Opening Day roster in terms of how important they are to the team’s success (with some pithy commentary sprinkled in along the way). Not surprisingly, you may find a couple of pitchers atop the list.

1. RHP Kevin Millwood

2. RHP Vicente Padilla

During their time in Texas, the Rangers are 71-44 (.617) when these two pitch six innings and 59-27 (.686) when they make quality starts (six innings or more; three earned runs or less allowed). Plain and simple: If these two guys make all their starts and pitch six innings or more regularly, this team will win more than it loses. If they consistently make quality starts, the Rangers are going to be a very dangerous team.

3. CF Josh Hamilton

4. LHP C.J. Wilson

Set up guy more important than a closer? Here it is. The Rangers don’t have a legit right-handed set-up pitcher. Wilson held right-handed hitters to a .269 batting average last year and a .352 on-base percentage. If he can get right-handers out in those sticky eighth-inning situations, bullpen roles will be a lot more settled.

5. 2B Ian Kinsler

6. 3B Michael Young

7. RHP Frank Francisco

8. RHP Brandon McCarthy

No way around this: McCarthy must stay healthy, must make all his starts and must consistently get through six innings. As the No. 3 starter, he can make the difference between a competitive rotation and a contending one. Key will be staying efficient with pitch counts. Over two years with Rangers he’s averaged 18.2 pitches per inning (184th among 190 big leaguers with at least 20 starts over the last two seasons).

9. LHP Matt Harrison

10.  DH Hank Blalock

Somebody has got to replace Milton Bradley as cleanup protection for Josh Hamilton. Blalock will get first shot. He’s got a .418 slugging percentage in the No. 4 spot. It is the second lowest among active players (64th of 65) with at least 500 at-bats in the cleanup spot. It’s got to come up. Last year’s MLB average was .483.

11.  RF  Nelson Cruz

12.  1B Chris Davis

13. C Jarrod Saltalamacchia

He is not the defensive catcher that Taylor Teagarden is, but he has enormous offensive potential. If he realizes that and shows a bit of progress with his catching and throwing, Teagarden may never be able to force his way into the lineup. If he doesn’t, the path to a catching coup may be wide open if Teagarden can prove he’s durable enough to handle the starting job.

14. SS Elvis Andrus

15. RHP Scott Feldman

16. LF David Murphy

17. OF Marlon Byrd

The Rangers won’t call the Murphy-Byrd duo in left a platoon, but if it looks like a platoon and acts like a platoon, it’s probably a platoon. That said, it’s also a pretty good platoon. Last year’s stats, based on a 600 at-bat season would project to a .286 average, 41 doubles, 18 homers, 93 RBIs and a .351 on-base percentage. Or in other words: Rusty Greer.

18. RHP Josh Rupe

19. RHP Jason Jennings

20. C Taylor Teagarden

21. RHP Kris Benson

Most likely a space holder for Derek Holland. He’s had a history of solid first half performances followed by second-half fades. Strange as it sounds, doing just that in 2009 might be exactly what the Rangers need from him.

22. LHP Eddie Guardado

23. RHP Warner Madrigal

24. SS Omar Vizquel

25. OF-DH Andruw Jones

So much hoopla this spring over his drive to make the roster in spring training and yet Jones ranks at the bottom of the list. He could easily force his way up list with strong early-season performance, but could just as easily force his way off the roster, too.

Bookmark and Share
6 Comments to “The Top 25: Ranking The Rangers Roster”
  • Mr. Pink

    Kevin Millwood rhp
    5 years/$60M (2006-10)

    5 years/$60M (2006-10)
    signed by Texas as a free agent 12/05

    $15M signing bonus (payable 2011-2015)

    06:$6M, 07:$7.5M, 08:$8.5M, 09:$11M, 10:$12M
    limited no-trade clause
    club may void deal after 2009 unless Millwood has:
    combined total of 540 IP 2007-09, or
    combined total of 350 IP 2008-09, or
    180 IP in 2009

    club may elect to keep Millwood even if he fails to hit IP totals

    deferred money allows Texas to compute annual average salary at $10.8M
    _____________________________________________

    Here you go, Evan,

    Millwood’s contract straight from Cot’s. Am certain you recognize the format. Funny thing is I have read 100 debates re Millwood hitting 180 innings this year & vesting that option for 2010. But not one mention of the $15mm in deferred bonus money he is due from 2011-2015.

    Only fitting that Millwood is listed as the most important Ranger. But I wonder how the Rangers feel about paying the guy $3mm/year until an unfathomable 2015?

    More to point, we have read tons of articles telling us how much more “inspired” Millwood will be this year, as if he would be standing in a bread line if he fails to hit 180 IP this year. To the contrary he can foul up again this year & stroll to his maibox for another freakin $15mm bucks regardless.

    I don’t consider myself any newsbreaker of sorts. But one cannot help but wonder how this fact escaped you, the DMN, LSB, Jamey, etc, etc. Or were you aware of the $15mm in deferred bonus money and just not think it was relevant? Curious, but it would certainly seem relevant to Hicks & the bankers who actually own the Rangers.

    As for Millwood, let’s keep our fingers crossed and hope he can justify what looks to be 11+12+15 = $38mm dollars if he hits that 180 IP; $26mm if he turns in a Sidney Ponson year.

    Holy Dale Carnegie! The power of motivation.

    btw – If you check Cots, agent = Scott Boras

    Now everything is in focus for me.

    Go Rangers!!!

  • Tom B

    I see a lot of ‘Dead Meat’ from 21 to 25. The proverbial, ‘Not as good as I once was, but as good once as I ever was.’ The Rangers will have to catch ‘Lightning in a bottle’ early to compete. If they do and some confidence gets generated there could be a good time at The Park most nights. The question, “Will most of us pay to see?” I hope so.

  • Josh Bobbitt

    Well well well.
    Here we have, I am the eternal optimist when it
    comes to OUR beloved Texas Rangers. Once again,
    this year I am really hoping/thinking/wishing,
    not sure which order,that we are playing meaningful games in September.
    Per Baseball Tonight, we are an up and coming team..

    Lets get this bad boy rolling…

  • Jesse

    A Haiku –

    Rangers’ sticks thunder.
    Are strikes to be thrown this year?
    Ben Sheets will save us.

  • Brett in SD

    Mr. Pink – almost every big contract in MLB contains deferred bonus/salary…the bottom line is that Millwood will have substantial motivation to reach 180 IP because he will guarantee a salary next year that he simply could not get in this economy if he became a free agent.

  • Mr. Pink

    Brett,

    Thanks for rsvp. I’m as familiar w/ MLB contracts as anyone. Just frankly surprised Millwood’s $15mm deferred never discussed in
    in the print media. Don’t know about radio or TV…don’t live in DFW. Not real bright of me since Cot’s is on the computer 7/24. If Millwood’s deferred bonus provision is common knowledge around DFW I thought I would have picked it up off one of the papers
    or blogs. Evidently not. Still wondering how I missed it or whether it is common knowledge around DFW. Call it “blaming the media for my ignorance” if the shoe fits.