Opening Day Miscellany & Observations

This was the first thing that struck me: During batting practice, Chuck Morgan showed highlights of the Rangers’ September 23, 2004 comeback victory over Oakland that ended with David Dellucci’s walkoff two-run double off of Octavio Dotel. It was the Rangers’ fifth win in a row and moved them to second place, just two games behind the A’s. Michael Young and Hank Blalock stood shoulder to shoulder, watching the highlights intently without saying a word to one-another. When it was over, Young nodded his head once and turned to Blalock as if to say — without saying it — that he was hungry to experience that feeling again.

Much was made of Elvis Andrus’s play at short — and rightly so, especially his fifth-inning gem to get Shin-Soo Choo — but the entire infield defense was exceptional. While it’s certainly true that no shortstop who has worn a Rangers uniform in the past ten years other than Andrus could have made that fifth inning play on Choo, it’s also true that no third baseman the Rangers have run out there in the past ten years could have made the play that Michael Young made to get Grady Sizemore in the sixth. Young’s quickness coming in on that ball was exceptional.

If / when Marlon Byrd is traded, it will leave a pretty large void in that clubhouse. Now I know why the guys who have been around this club every day for the last couple of years are pretty much unanimous in their support of him. Every time I saw him, either before or after the game, I thought “that’s what a great teammate looks like.”

Blalock, who has hit .247 / .312 / .404 against southpaws over the past three years, goes 2-for-3 with a bomb against a great lefty like Cliff Lee?

Jarrod Saltalamacchia or Ian Kinsler: I’m not sure which one’s motor runs faster. Both were so geeked up by 9:30 a.m., I wondered how they’d make it through the day.

There have been some whispers throughout the spring that C.J. Wilson was less than thrilled at losing his job as closer over an injury, but I got the sense in talking to him yesterday that he likes the idea of being part of the back end of a bullpen that can turn games into seven-inning affairs.

The Rangers ought to consider opening up the ballpark early enough for fans to watch the home team take BP every game.

Bookmark and Share
11 Comments to “Opening Day Miscellany & Observations”
  • Chris

    Another observation… I liked the upgrades to the ballpark… but…

    Why even “try” to use the new OOT board to show replays? Its VERY small, not worth it.

    And, what happened to the baseballs that ringed the stadium?

  • t ball

    Very encouraging day from Millwood, Salty and Andrus.

  • hammertimez

    I wish the Rangers and MLB.com had a “classic games” section. The September 23, 2004 game is one of the greatest games in Ranger history, and I’d love to see it again.

  • BaD Radio 29

    The Replay board on the OOT scoreboard is for all the people in CF and RF and the HR porch to be able to finally see Replays, which adds to the game day atmosphere. I personally like it.

    I completely agree about opening up the park in time for Rangers BP…that would be AWESOME! I know that I, and many others I have spoken to over the years, would be there early to watch Josh BP.

    That equates to more food and beer sales beforehand, and more money for Hicks (maybe even enough to pay his loans), and better fan experience….get it done Nolan!!!

  • SAD

    I’m not able to go to many games but I would love to be able to go early and watch BP.

  • Chris

    BaD, the OOT scoreboard replays are half the size of the main scoreboard, very hard to see from the HR porch. Not worth it.

  • Andrew in Boston

    Mike,
    You have written extensively on the byrd/murphy conundrum http://insidecorner.dmagazine.com/index.php/2009/03/15/rangers-position-previews-the-outfield/
    and many people have written about trading byrd. I guess this is primarily because this is his last year of Rangers control.

    But if Hicks is willing to expand the payroll and byrd is the better teammate, better player, and he makes the team more balanced (lefty/righty), why wouldn’t we keep him? Certainly he does not command more than Abreu ($5M per year). And he’s making $3.06M right now (http://rangers.scottlucas.com/site/40man.htm).
    Couldn’t we sign him to a 3 yr / $10-12M deal, and look to trade Murphy who won’t be a free agent until 2014? The return should be comparable if not better right? And our team is better because Murphy is under team control for so much longer, right? Long term is Byrd going to push out by Boggs?

    I guess I share your sentiment that Byrd is the better player, and I want the rangers to have the best team possible. Just thinking out loud.

  • Andrew in Boston

    oops…I meant the return would be better because Murphy is under team control.

  • JustSaying

    After watching the excitement that Andrus brings, I wonder what the chance is that Arias comes up at 2B and pushes Kinsler into LF………..defensive speed can be addictive

  • Rossometown

    Chris, I respect your opinion, but who makes you the voice of all fans who can’t see the main jumbotron? I, the fan with eyes who sits in parts of the ballpark (first deck, first baseline under the canopy) enjoys a place to see see what just happened. Granted, I visited Dr. Gary Tylock and now have 20/15 vision and can probably see the video screen in left better than you, Chris, but I do enjoy it.

  • Kenny In China

    Chris,

    In the future that board will not be used for replays. The changes that have been made are just phase one. Here’s a link, read it and you’ll get good info. http://forum.newbergreport.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=7792

    It’s better to have something than nothing!