D-tails
• Boxscore, Standings, Depot game blog
ARLINGTON – The most important moment of the Rangers Sunday’s game with Oakland didn’t come in the ninth inning when Adam Kennedy blasted a drifting fastball from Frank Francisco into the right field seats.
No, it came about an hour later when Francisco wandered back to his locker for the first time as a closer who had been beaten. Mr. Kennedy’s homer, his second of the game, gave Oakland a 5-4 win and denied the Rangers a four-game sweep.
When he finally got to his locker, Francisco had spent a long time in the weight room and an equal amount of time in the trainers’ room – his typical post-game routine. And when he finally appeared at his locker, at exactly 5:55.55 (according to the very specific clubhouse clock), he had the same cock-eyed, playful expression he’s worn after every converted chance as a closer.
Which is to say, all of them.
The moments after the game were significant because as much as the Rangers could live without ever seeing their closer fail, they know that won’t happen (though with Francisco, you were starting to wonder). They need to see how he responds after adversity.
First impressions: Exactly the same as he has with the wins and saves.
“I’ll just give it my best shot, every single time,” Francisco said. “That’s what I’m supposed to do and that’s what I will do.”
And really he has. Even though he suffered the loss on Sunday, the numbers he’s put up since ascending to the closer’s role last August are truly amazing. Sunday’s run was the first earned run he’s allowed as a closer, a span of 28 games and 28.2 innings. He held batters to a .139 average during that stretch and had a 4-to-1 (36-to-9) strikeout-to-walk ratio. While his ERA is no longer a pristine 0.00, what is still intact his is consecutive saves streak. It’s at 11 for the year, at 16 for his entire time at closer.
“It’s absolutely incredible what he’s done,” 3B Michael Young said. “To do that in the American League at this time, I mean, you give up a bloop single and a double, you’ve given up a run. It’s so easy. The guy is as close to automatic as you could be.”
Kennedy demonstrated how easy it is for a pitcher to give up a run.
After the Rangers rallied back from a 4-0 deficit to tie the game in the bottom of the eighth, Francisco came on in the ninth of a tie game, a move in adherence with conventional baseball wisdom. That is, you use your closer in the ninth in a tie game at home. You expect him to keep the score tied and then you expect to be able to manufacture the winning run in the bottom of the inning.
Francisco, who spent two weeks on the DL earlier in May with some biceps tendonitis, got Orlando Cabrera to pop to the catcher. But perhaps there should have been a sign there that Francisco was in for a tough day. Cabrera never had a hit in eight previous career at-bats against Francisco, yet Francisco, throwing nothing but fastballs, fell behind 3-and-1 before rallying back in the count.
Kennedy, who homered in the first inning against starter Kevin Millwood, then took another fastball for a ball. Francisco left his ninth consecutive fastball of the inning over the middle of the strike zone. Kennedy drove it into the upper Home Run Porch.
“There’s nothing you can do, but ask for another baseball,” Francisco said. “And then you try to get the next guy out.”
If he can maintain that approach – to let nothing change his demeanor on the mound – Francisco ought to be able to minimize any rough stretches he encounters.
@Evan: On a totally unrealted story, I have heard Omar Vizquel’s name come up a lot in regards to Bostons short stop situation http://www.boston.com/sports/baseball/redsox/gallery/2009/05_27_09_sox_possibles?pg=3 and most recently in Peter Kings MMQB column. Is this anything more than fans, columnists, and radio jocks just spouting ideas. Or is there a possibility the Rangers move Vizquel? It seems to me that we have other good options already on the 40 so this could be a move that makes sense, but how much does Andrus rely on Vizquel’s mentorship? Just wondering…
Now I understand why TonyLaRussa, Joe Torre and Lou Piniella aren’t so great according to baseball wisdom…
I don’t understanding why you would bring in a closer in a non-save situation?
@Andrew: I don’t think the Rangers are motivated to move Vizquel unless they get somebody to overpay for him. Right now, he’s a backup on a first-place club. Rangers won’t diminish their depth simply to trade him for a fringe prospect. Get the Red Sox to ante up a big-timer and maybe the situation changes.
Tsing Sao,
With regards to Torre, as somebody that has had Mariano Rivera in fantasy baseball just about every year since 2002, there are several times a years (maybe a half dozen) where he pitched the 9th inning at home in a tie game. In fact, I would venture EVERY time the sitaution arose where he was available that day. Can’t speak for Piniella and LaRussa. In that situation, you work backward from the normal game, as the game goes on. Closer in 9th. 8th inning set up guy in 10 (and maybe 11th), 7th inning guy in 11-12th and long men to finish.
It is absolutely the way that you play it. You don’t save your best pithcers and risk never actually using them (like a time out in football). Wash played it PERFECTELY.
@Jed E.: At home, come the ninth inning, if you don’t bring your closer into the game in a tie, you certainly aren’t going to get to use him with a lead. The situation reverses itself. You use your best pitcher to protect the tie and hope your offense can provide you a walkoff win. Because if you take the lead in the bottom of the ninth or later, well, I think you can do the math. There isn’t going to be a top of the next inning for him to pitch.
The mental makeup of a “Lights out” closer is to save a game not to protect a tie. There has to be meat on the hook to get that dog to bite. Barkers need not apply. Go with O’Day and he can give you two or more innings. Oakland is short on relievers and they will screw up before your system if you don’t panic and throw out your best with nothing for him to gain. Torre did great in New York those last few years. They won about as many World Serrie as did the Rangers. If your dog goes mad then bring in CJ.
BTW, Justin Smoak’s high school classmate just made his debut with Baltimore this weekend. Matt Wieders got a double and a triple. Justin has to be smoking, about now, about that.
I understand the logic Evan, it just seems as if the closer’s mindset is different when the game is not on the line. Maybe I’ll just chalk it up to the fact that Adam Kennedy is batting about .400 at the BallPark.
“I don’t think the Rangers are motivated to move Vizquel unless they get somebody to overpay for him. Right now, he’s a backup on a first-place club. Rangers won’t diminish their depth simply to trade him for a fringe prospect. Get the Red Sox to ante up a big-timer and maybe the situation changes.”
Evan,
dare I say Vizquel and Teagarden for Buchholz?
as weird as this may sound, I don’t know if we need to trade two of our best depth players for another pitching prospect since we’re loaded with them. just a thought.
@JackDaddy and evan: thank you! you explained it better than I did.
@evan Have you heard any bullpen arms mentioned? or we stuck on the bullpen or might we get a frontline starter?
I agree with Morgan.
At this point I don’t trade Visquel and Teagarden (V&T) for Buchholz.
The Sox would be gain a STARTING short stop and STARTING catcher out of that deal. If all the Rangers got out of that deal was someone at 2A or 3A then they loose and given the level that Teagarden could reach they loose even if Buchholz pans out and he hasn’t yet.
This is not the time to trade for prospects. Maybe if the Ranger’s fall out of the race
then they do that deal in September but not now.
Before I even listen to an offer for V&T at this point it better have Buchholz AND one of Ramon Ramirez, Daniel Bard or Hideki Okajima maybe a lower level prospect.
The Sox need a short stop, they have an aging catcher with no good options after Varitech and the Rangers don’t need a prospect. If the Rangers give the Sox two starting players, one with a very high ceiling and already in the majors then I want at least one quality reliever, Buchholz and a lower prospect or project.
morgan & Mao,
First of all it is my understanding that the club only controls Visquel through the end of the year.
Second, Salty has shown enough to where he will remain the starter.
So Mao, no the Rangers are trading two backup players and one with limited club control for a starter. What Boston does with them is irrelevant from the Rangers perspective.
Now jump ahead two years. The Rangers lose both Millwood and Padilla to free agency. However, the starting lineup now includes: Holland, Bucholz, Neftali, and two of Feldman, Harrison, and McCarthy.
I just do not think Theo would do the deal, but I can always hope.
Mao,
Sorry but you would be absolutely insane not to trade Omar and TT for Bucholz. He has great stuff, his AAA numbers are extremely impressive. He would be a starter for Boston if their rotation wasnt already to crowded with Vets, which Penny will be traded soon. The Sox have balked numerous times at the TT for Bucholz trade, and now your saying, if we throw in a 42 year old SS(who has played great on a limited basis, will he hold up playing everyday) who we only control for the rest of the year, then suddenly, you balk at that? No way.