Final installment.
Please: jump and read on.
10) Michael Main (20 year old RHP: Advanced-A)
– I am choosing to completely disregard Main’s results this year on the grounds that he has been stricken with what is still an undiagnosed illness (originally reported as mononucleosis).
At the same time, he’s losing too much developmental time for strange reasons and I’m beginning to get a strange feeling that fate is just not on his side. In other words, I am downgrading Main more for durability concerns than his disappointing results this season.
I’d talked to former Rangers pitching coordinator Rick Adair many times over the years, covering a lot of ground and a lot of players, but when he and I spoke about Main last fall, I’d never heard him talk about a pitcher with anything close to that enthusiasm.
During fall instructionals, Adair told me that he’d never seen a high school pitcher as polished as Main, except maybe Adam Wainwright. He told me that Main was, at that time, throwing “an extremely high percentage” of major league quality pitches.
I’ve seen Main myself. His mid-90′s fastball is extremely lively, but he has a tendency to leave it up in the zone. His curve has plus-plus, 12-6 action.
The truth of the matter is that the gap between Main’s stuff and Beavan’s is enormous. But as Woody Allen once said, eighty percent of success is showing up. Beavan does, Main doesn’t.
Main is done for the year. He has been sent home to Florida and won’t be called back to Surprise until August. There’s no reason that a healthy Michael Main can’t be at the top of this list a year from now.
9) Robbie Ross (20 year old LHP: Short Season-A)
– You don’t need to see Robbie Ross pitch to see that his stuff is outstanding right now. The 2008 second rounder is getting 6.20 ground ball outs for every one in the air and he’s averaging 13.86 strikeouts per nine through his first 25.1 professional innings. He’s held the league to a .234 batting average. Oh, and his K/BB ratio is 6.50. That just blows my mind.
Ross commands a 90-94 mph fastball with late life and a plus slider. As with virtually all high school pitchers, he needs to develop a change, but early reports on that offering are promising. Catcher Vin DiFazio says it’s dropping off the table.
I happened to see Ross’s first appearance in Surprise this spring and I was pleasantly surprised with the life on his fastball, but what really got my attention was his aggressive nature on the mound. He reminded me of John Danks in that way. Very tough, very competitive and very intense. He’s humble and focused on work. In other words, he’s got the sort of makeup necessary for continued success. Ross had an extremely strong spring that carried straight into extended and through the first month of NWL play, where he’s been the league’s most dominating pitcher.
Blake Beavan (20 year old RHP: Double-A)
– Nobody would have guessed two years ago when he was drafted that Blake Beavan would come to be known more for his coachability than his stuff, but the fact is that he’s in the Texas League just a couple of calendar years since his high school prom not because of dazzling stuff, but because he’s been receptive to coaching and had the pitchability to overcome some shortcomings in his repertoire.
Beavan’s velocity is down from where it was when he was drafted, the result of a necessary alteration to his then-dangerous mechanics. His slider isn’t what he famously cracked it up to be either, also probably the result in a change to his mechanics.
The big question on Beavan is whether he’ll get it back or figure out how to continue to succeed without mid-90′s cheese or the best slider he’s ever seen.
I say he probably will because Beavan has one thing going for him that I absolutely love to see in a prospect. A proven ability to learn and adjust. I can’t overstate how important that is to me.
Here’s an example: last year, when Beavan made his pro debut with Clinton, he was just beginning to work on a changeup. He didn’t throw one (or need one) in high school.
While he held Midwest League righties to a .207 / .238 / .349 line, left-handed hitters got to him at a 263 / .303 / .387 rate. Still good, but a meaningfully divergent split.
This year, Beavan has focused on developing — and trusting — his changeup. The results? He actually reversed the splits, becoming remarkably stronger against lefties in the Cal League.
With Clinton last year, Beavan posted a 3.47 ERA in nine starts before the All-Star break, striking out 22 hitters in 46.2 innings and opponents hit .262 against him. In 14 starts after the All-Star break, he posted a 1.68 ERA while holding opponents to a .214 batting average and dramatically improving his K rate (51 in 75 innings).
With Bakersfield this year, more of the same. With each passing month, he got better across the board. In four April starts, he had an ERA of 5.48 and got hit at a .274 clip while fanning 17 in 21.1 innings. In six May starts, he lowered his ERA to 4.26 and in June, he whittled it all the way down to 2.57 while limiting opponents to a .212 batting average and fanning almost a hitter per inning.
Through 34.2 innings in the Texas League, Blake Beavan has walked four. As always, the command is there. But he’s also allowed 47 hits (.322 opponents average) and fanned just 14. Let’s check back at the end of August to see what he did that month. If he’s the player I think he is, you’ll see radical improvement.
7) Kasey Kiker (21 year old LHP: Double-A)
– There are some who think that Kasey Kiker’s dominance of the Texas League is a smoke and mirrors act — maybe even an accident — but I’m not one of them. The league leader in strikeouts and among the leaders in ERA, Kiker — in my opinion — has an extremely advanced idea of what he’s doing out there. Yes, his velocity has been “down” (normally sitting 89-91 mph with his fastball) but I’ve seen him a couple of times and on both occasions, he’ll pop a 94 or even a 96. And then another one an inning later.
Kiker will bust a hitter inside (actually hitting them too often), but he’ll follow the high-and-tight cheese with offspeed stuff away and he has the command to drop either his curve or his change in for an easy strike on the outside corner once he’s backed a guy off the plate by an inch or two.
In my glass-half-full analysis of Kiker, he has an uncanny feel for changing speeds. On one occasion, I saw him hit every number on the gun between 77 and 94. Literally, every single one, making him very unpredictable. Personally, I think he does this on purpose and it’s a big reason that he’s holding the Texas League to a .219 batting average this year.
Kiker’s change is actually better than his curve right now. He seems to be just as likely to throw either one to a lefty or righty. Once again, unpredictable. Like Ross, Kiker is extremely competitive and it shows.
For me, this was going to be a huge year for Kiker. I wanted to see him post up and show some consistency. He had two bumpy outings in June, but otherwise he’s done the job so far. In my book, Kiker has improved his stock more than any other player in the system this year.
6) Max Ramirez (24 year old C: Triple-A)
– I’ll keep this one short and sweet. For my money, still the best all-around hitter in the Rangers system and I think he’ll be an above-average big league DH / backup catcher in the next year or so. I’m undeterred by his lackluster numbers this year because he was trying to play through a wrist injury.
5) Julio Borbon (23 year old CF: Triple-A)
– Carl Crawford? Juan Pierre? Tom Goodwin? People spend a lot of time trying to figure out what Borbon projects to be as a big leaguer. I’ve killed dozens of hours on this topic myself. The truth is that I don’t know.
What I do know is that Borbon is a smart kid, a phenomenal athlete and has demonstrated an ability to improve with instruction.
I believe that he’ll be an outstanding center fielder for the Rangers for many years to come and will remind everyone that it wasn’t a coincidence that the winning Rangers clubs of the 90′s featured center fielders who covered a ton of ground.
4) Wilmer Font (19 year old RHP: Class-A)
– For me, Wilmer Font just might better natural stuff than Nefali Feliz. The big boy brings high-90′s cheese and I’ve like what I’ve seen of his curveball which showed enormous promise two years ago and has now become a very solid offering with plus potential. He’s an imposing presence on the mound and he is clearly beginning to comprehend the nuances of pitching.
Font definitely has the physical ability to be a true top of the rotation starter and he’s moving towards becoming a pitcher instead of just a great big kid with a howitzer for an arm. The sky is the limit.
3) Justin Smoak (22 year old 1B: Triple-A)
– The positives are obvious and well documented. I’m not going to waste time with them here. Instead, I’m going to talk about the one flaw in Justin Smoak’s game. The only one.
He hit .196 / .268 / .314 against lefties in the Texas League. He’s going to be a big leaguer, and soon, but right now, I can’t tell you he’s going to be an everyday player.
He didn’t hit lefties in the MWL either (.231 / .333 / .385), though I didn’t pay much attention to that at the time because it was such a small sample. After his tour of the Texas League, I began to consider the possibility that it was evidence. And while he hit .317 / .404 / .622 against lefties in college, that was a far cry from the .413 / .551 / .819 he posted against right-handed pitchers.
In both college and pro action, you see that Smoak’s K/BB ratios against lefies are much, much worse than they are against righties, suggesting that the weaker lines are not merely a matter of coincidence or bad luck. He’s a much different hitter from the right side facing southpaws.
At South Carolina, Smoak drew 12 walks and struck out nine times in 82 at-bats against lefties. Fine. But then you look at the ratio against righties and you see a huge divergence: 45 walks and 19 strikeouts in 155 at-bats. He was more than twice as likely to walk against a righty.
With Frisco this year, he drew four walks and fanned nine times in 51 at-bats against lefties while drawing 35 walks and striking out 26 times in 132 at-bats against righties.
Smoak is going to tear up right handed pitchers in the big leagues. That’s pretty safe to say. The extent to which he can solve lefties will determine if he’s going to be a perennial All Star, a solid everyday player with a notable flaw or a platoon guy.
2) Neftali Feliz (21 year old RHP: Triple-A)
– I’ve said many times that I think Feliz is a closer, not a starter and I still feel that way (though I pray I’m wrong about that). This, more than anything, is why I can’t make him the top prospect in the system. Though he is clearly one of the most naturally gifted pitchers to come through this system — or any system — in many years, that alone doesn’t make him a future ace starter.
1) Martin Perez (18 year old LHP: Class-A)
– I’ll just lay it right out there and admit that I am so taken with everything about this kid that I’m unable to be fully objective about him. OK? Feel free to dismiss my opinion on those grounds.
Having said that, I feel that way for a reason. Perez is about the most complete pitcher in the system at age 18. His fastball — 91 – 94 mph — has plus movement and he can command it. His bender is plus-plus and he can command it. When I saw him unleash a diving turnover changeup in a spring training game in Surprise this year, I nearly wet my pants (so I’m hardly shocked that he’s held Sally League righties to a .225 / .290 / .325 line this year).
And the results match up with the ability.
Perez is special. He knows it and he knows you know it. The only thing that can stop him is health and there’s no reason to think that it will.
Great list! Considering that it’s an impossibility for all 40 on this list to advance to the Rangers big league club, the key is to figure out who is tradeable for an asset like a front-line starting pitcher like Halladay.
You basically presented four levels of lists: those who just missed making it, 21-40, 11-20 and 10-1. I would take one from each level and see if that’s good enough. My suggestions: Pina, Lemon, Moreland and Kiker.
The addition of Scheppers and Purke would make the top-10 prospects list pretty formidable. On the downside, I don’t see anyone on the list that looks like a legitimate ace starting pitcher who is likely to see Arlington in the next 2-3 years (however, Holland might be that guy). There are a lot of “middle-of-the-rotation” types (e.g., Beavan and Hunter) and guys who are still young (e.g., Main, Perez and Font) and guys who are projected more as relievers than starters (e.g., Feliz and Kiker). The future’s very bright, I just don’t know if that future will come to pass in 2010. Maybe (maybe) 2011, but more likely 2012 or even 2013 before a most of these guys are making substantial contributions to the Rangers’ starting pitching staff.
Great article sounds like you really know these guys. This is turned out to be a very exciting year!
Mike- Do you see Perez staying in class A the rest of this year? IF that happens where does he go next year? The same questions about Font too. Are we looking three years down the road before we see these guys in Arlington?
Allow me to vent: Those guys at BTiA — Joey, Jason and Trip — are good friends of mine. I chat with just about all of them every day. I’ve been supporters of their work all along. But I’m still a little ticked off that my own organization couldn’t wait to run this post down the board by posting a link to someone else’s mid-season prospect rankings.
Mike …. quit whining. We only pay attention to your stuff.
Now …. Perez. Can he make Porcello leaps? Can he be here next year? Or is he two or even three years away? What about Font? And Kiker?
RWC: I think that Perez will stay in Hickory all year and then possibly open 2010 in Frisco. Just a hunch. If he does go to Bakersfield — whether at the end of this year or the beginning of next year — it will be a very short stint.
Hindman, if you build it they will come. Dropping that info about Main makes this thing worth it by itself.
Great read altogether, looking forward to seeing movement up and down the charts by these guys. My sights are raised a bit for Kiker, especially. He’s hit one dude in his last 4 starts. Improvement, improvement, improvement…
@Mike: I saw Kiker pitch the 1st inning at the All star game in Frisco. I was blown away with how he pitches with conviction. I saw Beavan twice and it looked like he would drop his arm angle when throwing off speed pitches. During the second game the other team tee’ed off on his fast ball because it looked like they saw it coming. Of course it didn’t help when Frisco had 3 errors in one inning. Really not impressed with Whittleman.
I do like the idea of having a teired list instead of a flat out ranking. Seems it would be easier for you.
SSHorn: I’m just cranky these days. You really should add BTiA to your list. Those guys are great. As for Perez, I can’t rule anything out. My bet is that they’ll be a bit more careful with him than Detroit has been with Porcello because he’s not as physically strong as Porcello.
Brett: Holland can be that guy next year and so can Nefti. Personally, I’d prefer to see him continue to start because he still needs a lot of refinement. Perez won’t be that guy next year, but I think he will be within two or three years. He’s that good. With Wilmer, he’s improving a great deal very quickly all of a sudden. He missed almost all of last year so this is a huge year for him and he’s suggesting that he too could come quickly.
at what point would the Rangers tell Smoak to scrap the switch hitting and just bat left handed? Are there any recent instances where that has happened?
Am I sniffing glue to think that Toronto would take, in exchange for Halladay, a package of Pina (value as a catcher), Lemon (value as a middle infielder), Poveda (young arm) and Kiker (could be MLB-ready next year) and maybe throw in Mendoza as well? I wonder if the Phillies could meet or exceed that kind of package?
David: The only examples I can remember is the Cubs’ Ryan Theriot, who stopped switch hitting in 2005, and Giants SS Ivan Ochoa who stopped last year. Theriot immediately went from a .250 hitter with a .650 OPS to a .300 hitter with a .750 OPS
Da Blade: No chance. Feliz or Holland would have to be in the package. Probably Teagarden too.
Ouch. Would love to keep both Feliz and Holland. But if I had to bite the bullet, it would be a package headlined by Holland-Teagarden. Only because Halladay is that good.
Mike,
After having thought about the Rangers prospects just about non-stop for the past 2 years and trying to envision where this thing is going, I think that barring a trade, where I have come on my thinking is this:
The 2 most important players in this system, and the 2 that will determine whether we win 1 or 2 WS in the next 6 years, are Main and Perez.
Hear me out. They aren’t more important than Holland or Feliz or Smoak or Elvis, from their standpoint of what they will contribute. But I think we now have a fairly certain idea that all those guys are going to be real good players, if not great (in some role or another). Guys like Hunter, Borbon, Ramirez, Beavan and Kiker are all also important (both in what they can give us on the field or bring in a trade).
But Main and Perez seem to be the two guys that are “for sure” that have legitimate ACE like potentioal in this system. If they both fail, its probably too much to ask of Holland/Feliz to carry this thing and we’re probably rolling the dice on the right trade. If Kiker/Beavan, et. all fail, it shouldn’t be fatal.
But if one of Main or Perez hit, and hit BIG, I believe we have a great chance to strongly contenct for a title. If they both do, I think you can hope for a sustained run with multiple titles.
Again, a HUGE simplification of this entire thing, but its kind of where my mind has wrapped itself around.
meant the two guys that AREN’T for sure
by the way, in any trade that we might entertain for ANYONE, i would include Feliz before Holland in an instant. In my mind, Perez, Holland, Elvis and Smoak would be untouchables in this system. Everyone else, I would at least listen.
I’ve seen enough of Holland and listend to him enough to believe that he’ll be our staff ace for the next 7 years. I think at worst, at the very worst, he puts up mark buerle type numbers. However, I think he gives much more (top 7 in baseball more).
Mike: Yea, I think Holland and Feliz will be very good, I’m just now sure when. I can’t help thinking about how great Felix Hernandez was going to be when he broke into the big leagues at age 19. And now, in his fourth full season, he’s finally starting to become an “ace” in terms of his overall numbers, approach and reliability. Maybe Holland and Feliz will get it quicker than Hernandez did. Maybe not.
Jack Daddy: I’d be more upset about them trading Perez or Holland than Feliz. I think your theory is plausible. They are going to have three or four good, solid major league pitchers in the group you discussed and then the question becomes whether you find two well above average pitchers. If three from the foursome of Holland, Feliz, Perez and Main hit and pitch somewhere near their full potential in the next three years, then the Rangers are sitting very pretty.
Mike: Are we looking at Borbon being close to a Jacoby Ellsbury type player?
Mike,
You said what i was trying to say much clearer – that’s why you get the big bucks!!
That was exactly what I was thinking and meaning.
If 3 of those 4 don’t hit “BIG”, than we’re at the mercy of JD turing our “glut” of #4s and #5s (and borderline #3s) — Hunter, Harrison, Beavan, Kiker, Feldman, McCarthy, Moscosco, Murphy, Poveda, etc. into higher ceiling arms.
I suppose all of this changes (for the better) if Purke and/or Scheppers sign (and are healthy). Then presumable you are hoping you get 3 out of 6 to hit. (perez, holland, feliz, main and those 2) or (more realistically), you find it easier to stomach moving a main or feliz.
brett in SD – i hear all the “tap the break” pieces about Felix. I’ll say 2 things about felix:
1. he isn’t (or least doesn’t strike me) as the most mature guy in the world, so to the extent that he “under-achieved” in the past 3 years, i would attribute some of that to that. my sense on our kids is that they are much more mature.
2. i need to check his #s, but remember the offense he’s pitched for. his low win total is impacted by that. but i’ll ackknowledge that he hasn’t been consistent.
but i don’t get too concerned about holland taking 4 years to contribute big just because of king felix. to me, the guy is a knucklehead (and 2 years younger than holland when he came up, i believe).
@brett, here are felix’s 3 full seasons. we like to think he has disappointed (and maybe that’s true based on his talent – see this year), but it’s hardly as if he was just ordinary. Good eras and IP totals. higher whips than you would want, but not horrific and not unlike what you saw from Jake Peavy in his first 2 years. but even when he was allowing more baserunners, he wasn’t getting lit up on the scoreboard.
2008 200.2 9 11 3.46 1.39
2007 190.1 14 7 3.93 1.38
2006 191.0 12 14 4.52 1.34
Jack Daddy – I agree, Felix hasn’t been “bad.” In fact, I’d say he’s been pretty darn good considering he wasn’t old enough enjoy a post-game beer with his teammates until his third big league season. But he hasn’t exactly been an “ace” until this, his fourth season. And now he’s about as good as they get. The Rangers need an ace to be World Series contenders, but their two best “closest to the bigs” pitching prospects (Holland and Feliz) have 60 IP amongst them, with Holland sporting a near 6.00 ERA and Feliz apparently headed for the bullpen. I just think it’s going to take some time (i.e., no sooner than 2011 at the earliest) before they are playoff-ready starting pitchers who can consistently shut down the best offenses in the game.
@brett, there is no doubt that any type of post-season success in 2010 is (barring a trade) going to have to mirror the White Sox 05 WS run, where they were top to bottom strong, with no real “ACE” (you could argue buehrle, but to me he is closer to a Kevin Millwood than a Jake Peavy or Doc Halladay).
You could actually see pretty strong comparisions in the 2010 rotation and those sox: Garcia, Contreras, Garland, Buehrle. Don’t remember who their 5th was (though BMac started a couple of times i believe).
By 2011, you would expect that Holland has established himself as the rotation horse.
Mike, Not a mike bianucci fan? Didn’t see him in the top 40, I may have missed him though. BA says Bianucci is a more athletic Kevin Mench with slightly more pop.
I hate to say this, but we aren’t going to be competing for anything more than a play-off contender before 2011 or 2012 unless we begin trading the minor league depth for established pitching. Holland is our best prospect as a starter at this point, and look at his resume to date. Feliz has an electric fastball, but doesn’t have the off-speed pitches to allow him to be a winning major league starter next year at this point. Using him in relief this year only assures that will happen. I think we are making a mistake with how we are handling him this year, but that is a different thread. . Perez is a great prospect, but he is 18 and probably will start 2010 in Bakersfield based on how we have developed other young arms over the past couple of years. Main won’t pitch again this year. He also will be back in high A next year. Neither will even whiff the majors until 2011 at the earliest.
We have a great depth of prospects in the system, but most of it is two to three years away. Kiker and Beavan are the closest to being in the rotation among Mike’s top prospects. Kiker looks closer at this point. He has dominated AA the past month. Beavan has hit a plateau that he will have to overcome. If Kiker continues to throw like he is now, he will see OKC this year. I fully agree with Mike that he has improved his stock more this year, than anyone else in the system. I don’t see him as a reliever at this point. He can be a middle of the rotation starter.
09 is the Year: I am a Bianucci fan, but I discussed this issue in the preface to the 21-40 segment. I generally don’t put any stock in what a college hitter does in short season or low-A. Unless and until they prove themselves in Double-A, I don’t make too much of their numbers. Nothing personal against Bianucci.
I’m confused why the “best all-around hitter” on the farm is listed beneath a guy that you aren’t convinced will be an everyday player.
Great stuff as always Mike! Gotta go back and read the rest of your list!
Can I order more then one at a time?