The 39-Man Roster: Ranking Each Of The Texas Rangers In Order Of Value This Season

On the way to a 48-39 record that included spending most of the first half in first place, the Rangers have used 37 players. But there were a total of 39 players on the active roster (neither INF Joaquin Arias nor C Max Ramirez appeared in games). From No. 39 to No. 1, we attempt to rank the individual Rangers in terms of contributions. But you can pretty easily guess who Nos. 38 and 39 are.

39. INF Joaquin Arias: Was up for three days without playing.

38. C Max Ramirez: Up only two days without playing. Why is he more valuable than Arias? Cost the cash-strapped Rangers about $2,300 less in pro-rated salary.

37. RHP Luis Mendoza: One game, one inning, four runs. Since start of last year he has a 9.09 ERA in 26 appearances. Probably taken off 40 man roster when Rangers add either RHP Neftali Feliz or RHP Orlando Hernandez to big league roster.

36. OF Greg Golson: Also appeared in one game, a blowout loss, but at least he gave Marlon Byrd an inning’s worth of rest.

35. RHP Kris Benson: Appeared once in a win in eight outings. Knocked Scott Feldman out of Opening Day rotation, then got Hurt. Waived. Cleared waivers. Hurt again.

34. RHP Warner Madrigal: Like Benson, he pitched once in a win in eight appearances. That was against the worst-hitting team in the league (Oakland) when Rangers held a 12-run lead. Safe to say there isn’t much confidence in him.

33. RHP Josh Rupe: Got two outs in first appearance of season, then allowed 16 of next 28 hitters to reach before being taken off 40-man roster. No way around it: He was a huge disappointment.

32. RHP Guillermo Moscoso: Main value was as optionable extra piece for bullpen. Called up twice, pitched in three games. Probably haven’t seen the last of him this year either.

31. OF Brandon Boggs: Called up when Josh Hamilton went on DL for surgery, he never got the chance to give team the spark he provided in 2008. Was 1-for-17 when he did play.

30. RHP Dustin Nippert: Hasn’t shown much in two starts after missing first three months of season. Uncertain how many more chances he’ll get.

29. RHP Willie Eyre: Manager Ron Washington has lots of confidence in him. Now over groin strain, maybe he can justify that confidence. But stands behind Feliz, Hernandez in line for bullpen spot.

28. OF Julio Borbon: On field, only real contribution was a big pinch hit in important win over Angels. Off field, maybe his odd promotion to majors sent shock wave through veterans Hank Blalock and Andruw Jones. It’s possible.

27. RHP Doug Mathis: That the 27th most valuable player on this team has a 0.00 ERA and .132 opponents batting average in his primary job (relief work) says volumes about how much deeper Rangers are than in past. He’s 27th only because Washington mostly uses him mostly as mop-up man in losses.

26. LHP Matt Harrison: Had nice three-week run, but has more DL stints (two) than wins (0-3) in the last two months. Has a 10.61 ERA in four starts over last 60 days.

25. RHP Brandon McCarthy: In battle of DL-prone pitchers, he gets edge over Harrison. He has one more win (five) in same number of starts (11). But after another scapula injury, his chances of long-term rotation work are slimmer than Harrison’s.

24. LHP Derek Holland: Long-term his value is much higher, but he’s got a lot of work to do on secondary pitches. His role right now is that of left-handed long guy.

23. RHP Jason Grilli: Plucked off reclamation pile a month ago to aid in middle relief, he’s helped solidify roles in bullpen. Relievers have 2.69 ERA since he stepped on mound. Veteran has added to relievers sense of esprit de corps.

22. RHP Tommy Hunter: The lessons Holland is learning this year, Hunter learned last year. Hunter might just rise on this list in second half as a durable, tough starter who could help solidify back of rotation. Gotten better with each start this season.

21. RHP Jason Jennings: Effective as middle/long guy, particularly when brought in to start an inning. Converted starter has struggled when called on with runners on base (allowed 10 of 18 inherited runners to score).

20. LHP Eddie Guardado: After terrible April, he’s got a 2.66 ERA and .214 opponents batting average since May 3. Nobody more willing to answer the bell. Nobody is better role model for relievers.

19. INF Omar Vizquel: Became all-time hits leader from Venezuela, but, in terms of a contribution to this team, it pales in comparison to his steady play at short on days Rangers try to rest Elvis Andrus. And he’s essentially been a secondary instructor for Andrus as he goes through rookie season. No errors in 94 chances at three infield positions.

18. C Taylor Teagarden: Rangers lose nothing when backup catcher is in lineup. Has helped steady both LHP Matt Harrison and RHP Vicente Padilla. Has a 4.30 catcher’s ERA in 23 games, a touch better than starting C Jarrod Saltalamacchia (4.36).

17. 1B Chris Davis: Defensively, he’s been a top five player, but offensively his season has been a huge disappointment. Rangers finally had to send him to the minors after strikeouts reached embarrassing levels. Good as defense is, he’s going to have to hit to.

16. CF Josh Hamilton: And truthfully, he could be lower on the list. Injuries and indecision over swing trigger mechanism led to disappointing first half. Good news: Showing more patience since return from second DL stint. A fresh, healthy, locked in Hamilton for second half could be a boon for Rangers offense.

15. DH Andruw Jones: Among Rangers with at least 100 at-bats, he ranks first in at-bats per RBI (5.09) and at-batas per home run (12.36), but he now is what he is and that is a DH against left-handed pitching. Has had some very big hits in that role.

14. C Jarrod Saltalamacchia: Has greatly improved his catching skills, which is job one. Next step: Progress as a hitter. If anything, it looks like he has regressed at the plate. Averaging a strikeout every 2.96 plate appearances, which would be second worst in majors (to Chris Davis) if he had enough at-bats to qualify.

13. OF David Murphy: Since starting out the season in an 0-for-23 skid, he’s hitting .313. Has forced his way back into a significant role.

12. 1B-DH Hank Blalock: Didn’t respond great to a platoon DH situation, but since he took over for Chris Davis at first, he’s hitting .423 with a .483 OBP. And his 19 homers in 280 plate appearances can’t be overlooked.

11. RHP Vicente Padilla: Threatening him with waiver move seemed to get his attention. Since clearing waivers in early June, he is 4-1 with a 3.00 ERA. He’s working quickly, trusting fielders and has been more engaged with teammates in clubhouse.

10. LHP C.J. Wilson: A rough final weekend in Seattle not withstanding, he’s taken to whatever role the Rangers have thrust at him – multi-inning guy, setup guy, closer. Has won back the confidence of Washington after shaking that last year and with an early-season blow up at Detroit.

9. RHP Darren O’Day: Perhaps the greatest in-season waiver pickup in Rangers history? After being picked up when Mets dumped him, O’Day gave the Rangers a legitimate setup man. Forget the 1.93 ERA in 28 innings with Rangers; he has not blown a lead this season. His 11 holds rank ninth in AL.

8. RHP Frank Francisco: Converted first 12 save chances before injury knocked him out of closers role for three weeks. Only times he’s given up runs are on homers. He’s allowed four. Putting Wilson and O’Day in front of Francisco is a big reason why Rangers are 40-2 when leading after six innings this season. They have not lost this year when heading to the ninth with a lead.

7. OF Nelson Cruz: A late addition to the All-Star team, Cruz is on his way to a 30-homer season and perhaps joining the 20-20 club (he already has 22 homers and 13 steals). If he can cut down on chasing some bad breaking balls, he could be an absolute monster in the middle of the lineup.

6. 2B Ian Kinsler: The batting average (.250) and on-base percentage (.327) are disappointments, but Kinsler is on pace for 102 RBIs, which would set an all-time record from the leadoff spot. Possibly could go 30-30 as well (already has 20 homers, 18 steals). Could be only 11th leadoff man to reach 30 homers and only seventh to go 30-30. And by the way, defense has been phenomenal. He has six errors this year; had 16 at the All-Star break in 2008.

5. SS Elvis Andrus: Rookie has done everything asked of him. Offensive numbers are about exactly what was expected. Despite 12 errors, fielding has been phenomenal. All-around defensive improvement has had big impact on improved pitching performance. Andrus has been a huge part of the improved defense.

4. RHP Scott Feldman: Ego-free pitcher just does what he’s told. Early that meant going back to bullpen. Now, he’s as effective a starter as the Rangers have. He’s gone at least five innings in all 15 starts. Two-thirds of those starts have qualified as quality starts. Rangers are 11-4 when he starts.

3. OF Marlon Byrd: At moments, he’s been impatient at the plate, but he’s as versatile a player as there is in lineup. Can play all three outfield positions. Has hit in team-high six different spots in the order. Hitting team-best .348 with runners in scoring position; .438 with two outs and RISP.

2. RHP Kevin Millwood: The biggest factor in improved starting pitching is not Nolan Ryan or Mike Maddux; it’s Millwood. Took last September’s challenge to be in better conditioned to heart. Quick pace on mound set the tone for the rest of the rotation. Leads AL in innings pitched, huge stat for Texas pitchers. A Ranger hasn’t led the AL since Kevin Brown (265) in 1992.

1. 3B Michael Young: Maintains excellent approach at the plate. Smoothly transitioned to third different infield position. Continues to be a quiet, low-key example of how to do things professionally and correctly. His influence on young players is seen from Ian Kinsler to Elvis Andrus.

Bookmark and Share
62 Comments to “The 39-Man Roster: Ranking Each Of The Texas Rangers In Order Of Value This Season”
  • Chad Crudup

    Evan,

    It must have set your pants a-humming to rank your mancrush MY #1. The irony is that he is arguably worthy of the ranking even though you would have certainly put him there under any circumstance short of him spending the entire first half on the DL.

    Of course he has NOT transitioned smoothly to 3B unless you consider being almost universally ranked as the worst defender at the position in the majors “smooth”. Hopefully by the end of the season he will be closer to league-average but I fear his defensive shortcomings at 3B will be every bit as glaring as they were at SS.

    Thankfully Michael has shown improved plate discipline this year and has seemed to rediscover his power stroke.

    Byrd #3 and Cruz #7? I guess you’re still buying into all that sunshine the Rangers pump out about Marlon’s clubhouse presence. Cruz has played superior D and holds a 122-108 OPS+ edge. And Byrd “has hit in team-high six different spots in the order”? Wow there’s a HOF plaque-worthy bullet point.

    Otherwise a pretty good list. Thanks for the coverage and this forum. It has lapped any coverage we are getting from the traditional media.

  • becca

    i think padilla should be higher than 11. when he’s on, he’s the best pitcher on the squad. that and his hair is always fantastic. something seemingly overlooked in your rankings.

  • Kinsler Fan

    The only glaring error is Murphy being so overlooked. He had a bad first two weeks and has been the #2 bat behind MY since then. He has definitely contributed more, and more consistently, than Blalock.

    I’ve noticed that Murphy keeps getting overlooked in game write-ups, synopses, analysis, etc. by most of the local and all of the national writers. Maybe he’s getting his contributions in too early in the games. . . I dunno. This guy has all of the spunk and work ethic of Rusty, I guess he just hasn’t had the highlight reel moments yet. He’s nothing if not consistent and dependable.

    Your write-up of Kinsler is spot on, and exactly why he shouldn’t be a leadoff man. In fact, if he was batting almost anywhere else, he wouldn’t be viewed as nearly the disappointment that he has been thus far.

    Great stuff.

  • B. Money

    Whoops – Kinsler Fan was a fake username for an internet argument on a different thread. Those HSOs were brought to you buy B. Money. :)

  • Kinsler is Overrated

    When is Harrison suppose to go out on rehab? He could certainly use 4-5 starts in AAA to get his stuff together.

  • GhettoBear04

    How can you point out the defensive value of Elvis, Kinsler, and Davis and then rank MY number 1??? My top 5:

    5. Feldman
    4. Elvis
    3. Millwood
    2. Cruz (play him everyday Wash!)
    1. Kinsler

  • Russ

    Looks pretty good. Not sure about Byrd at #3, but everyone will have a small disagreement.

  • Brett in SD

    Evan,
    Unless Borbon made a pitching appearance for the Rangers, I believe Doug Mathis should be referred to as the 27th most valuable player in the.

  • Brett in SD

    …blurb next to his name.

  • Cbank

    Being reminded that Salty is 2nd in Ks per AB–Is it possible that Rudy is a great instructor for experienced hitters but sucks with the new guys? Should we get another guy to help with all the new guys this year and next (Borbon, Smoak, etc)?

  • Ehren

    I’m afraid I haven’t seen the universally ranked worst defender this year at 3rd base yet. Chad’s world might be coming to an end.

  • Rangers Fan

    I would put CJ Wilson higher if only because he has played way more and has been awesome, except for a couple games. Just my thought.

  • Chad Crudup

    Ehren>>> Just about every defensive metric invented has MY ranked dead last in defensive performance at 3B

  • badspellr

    Mendoza and Benson should be ranked 38 and 39. At least Arias and Ramirez didn’t hurt the team by appearing.

  • JRB

    @ehren: MY has the worse fielding stats (going to his left) at 3B in the league, and by far costs the team more runs defensively than anybody else. It’s not just a stat thing, but something that is obvious by watching. For example, the hot shot that MY snagged during the ASG? He’s missed that ball all year long – and balls two steps away to his left never get made, usually at times when it was needed to get the team out of the inning. I would rank MY highly on my list too, but not because of what he brings defensively.

  • Juboon

    Perhaps this has been addressed elsewhere and I’ve missed it, but why is Salty seen as being better than Teagarden? Is he supposed to be better offensively? Or maybe he just IS better and I’m overly influenced by the fact that I think Teagarden works better with the pitchers? :) Just wonderin’.

  • Evan Grant

    @Chad: I tend to use more than just metrics to determine my rankings.

  • JRB

    @EG: Josh is way too high, almost a non-factor when you think about it. I’d rank Harrison higher. He’s hit hard times recently, but he way team MVP during the time when this team needed SOMEthing after that terrible April – and his new Gould aggressiveness at that point rubbed off positively on the entire staff. Byrd is probably too high, but I like that he and Murphy are getting some positive recognition – it’s not their fault they are having to play in the middle if the order because of the rest of the teams inadequacies.

    Kinsler is below league average in OBP – which I’d appalling from the lead-off spot after such a torrent April – which shows that for the majority of the season, he’s been quite terrible. And I cringe when I think how he almost made the ASG. Same can be said of Cruz, to a slightly lesser degree.

    Feldman would be my MVP. The Rangers win games when he starts – and that is the most important of all stats.

  • tugturdwell

    I look for Cruz to have a monster second half. Confidence has always been an issue with Nelson. He seems to get down too easy. He always had the talent. But being selected for the All Star game and out hitting Pujol, Howard, etc in the Derby while being watched in adoration by all the Dominican will do wonders for his confidence. You could see it in his manner during the contest. Watch Out – I bet he cracks 40+ dingers.

  • Evan Grant

    @JRB: But here’s the philosophical question and one I hope to engage the room in more detail later on: Kinsler is having a sub-par year when it comes to doing the things leadoff hitters normally do (OBP, batting average), but is on a historic pace for leadoff power numbers. Don’t you have to take that into account?

    Hamilton has been kind of a non-factor, but its hard for me to put him below anybody else below him on the list.

    When you try ranking guys in order of value as opposed to just assigning them letter grades for their performance, you end up having to balance a whole lot of other stuff.

    That’s why my list is open for a whole lot of interpretation.

  • Joe A

    Right on Evan.

    Subjective defensive stats, many decided on by several individuals with their own biases
    are at best suspect and, at worst, useless.

  • ed

    “he’s going to have to hit to.”
    ->
    to
    ->
    “he’s going to have to hit, too.”

    Which I bet you know.

    When can we meet at a RoughRiders game?

  • JRB

    @EG:

    No, I don’t think we should be placing much value on lead-off power numbers. A solo homerun isn’t of much more
    value to a team than a guy who gets on base, steals, and puts pressure in opposing pitchers. For me, regardless of the place in the order, that’s what drives any good offense. Heck, when you think about it, Chris Davis wasn’t that much worse than Kinsler in the power department, but his numbers look better just because he is lead-off? A bit superficial if you ask me. In fact, I think Kinsler’s RBI numbers look so good chiefly because the bottom of the lineup is getting in base for him, whereas he is hitting .323 with RISP. In fact, he’s only .210/.292/.435 in his first PA – which shows that he’s hitting out of position.

    My biggest beef with Kinsler is that he is hitting .225 since May 1. That makes him pretty invaluable to this team for
    all but a
    month of
    this year, regardless of what his place in the order is.

  • Richard Durrett (DMN)

    Great topic, Evan. I liked the list. I will say that I think Kevin Millwood would be No. 1 on my list over Michael Young. That’s not to take anything away from Young’s intangibles and clubhouse leadership (which is considerable), but the biggest thing this team preached this off-season was getting more from the pitching staff. Millwood has led the way on that from his fitness to his ability to grind it out and keep his team in games. That’s what a No. 1 pitcher has to do. So Millwood get’s my No. 1 vote. But I liked the list.

  • mr. clean

    It’s not Max Ramirez’ fault he did not play. He should be in top 30.

  • JRB

    @Joe:

    What is “subjective” about a defensive stat? Perhaps you meant to say “objective.”

    Watching with only your eyes minus such metrics would be the definition of subjective, would it not?

    Admittedly, I’m firmly on the Newberg/Evan Grant side of the Sabermetric debate. I think there is something to be said about emotion, toughness, and intelligence on a baseball field that cannot be measured by a stat, especially when it comes
    to pitching.

    But even without a metric, people are watching a different
    game if try think MY is playing good defense, or if Kinsler has been a
    valuable offensive contributor. My eyes are seeing MY whiff on a lot of hard hit grounders (that do not show up as errors) and Kinsler spending
    most of his time on the pine mourning his most recent pop-up out and NOT being on the bases, where
    he should be. Regardless of position in the lineup or power numbers, it’s hard to call a player a good offensive player if he cannot get on base at LEAST on par with the league average.

  • Ehren

    Anything created by a person is subjective since a person has to set the parameters.

  • Joe A

    @JRB

    Any stat that is based on what a player “should” have done is subjective. People with their own biases decide whether player “A” would have made a play that player “B” did not. An objective stat applies one and only one standard to all players.

  • Tommy

    @EG: Having the best power numbers for a leadoff hitter is nice, but it’s not what you need out of a leadoff hitter. Otherwise, Blalock or Cruz would be just as valuable in the leadoff spot. Then you could put MY at #9 and say we rank him higher because he gets more hits and has more power than a typical #9 guy.

    Kinsler was great overall and at leadoff in April, but since then he has been a liability at leadoff. His numbers fit a #5 or #6 hitter.

    Would it be such a bad thing to switch up the lineup a bit? Why is Kinsler so entrenched at leadoff? Why not switch Murphy and Kinsler? If you look at their stats only, it makes sense to me, but I’m sure I’m missing something.

  • Mike E

    I think what people tend to overlook about Kinsler is that even when he’s not hitting he still manages to score runs. And more often than not, when he scores the Rangers win. That’s gotta put him higher than 6th most valuable…

  • Einstein

    You won’t believe this Evan, but the LSB’ers are now saying that Kinsler has hit as well as Young this year. Ah, the MY hate has surely reached epic and irrational levels.

  • Ranking the Rangers roster so far this season

    [...] Grant posted a ranking of the Rangers’ roster in the first half of the season on D Magazine’s …. It’s a very interesting read. Evan’s top 5: 1. 3B Michael Young: Maintains excellent [...]

  • mike

    query. What’s up with Hurly and benoit?

  • AJM

    “Any stat that is based on what a player “should” have done is subjective. People with their own biases decide whether player “A” would have made a play that player “B” did not. An objective stat applies one and only one standard to all players.”

    By that definition, fielding percentage is a “subjective” stat (since it is based on whether or not a player should have made a play) and stats such as UZR or +/- are “objective” stats, since they simply record whether or not a player made a play on a particular type of ball.

  • eddy andre

    CJ is overated. Four losses and four blown saves would mean at least six more wins. Millwood is most over-rated player in baseball. Playing for contract and is not a number one starter. Number 4 like he was with Atlanta. I get so tired in hearing how he is having a good season. I would play great if I only had to pitch a paltry 185 innings to get an automatic 14 million. As for Mr. Over-Rated , Over- Paid, in 7 years as a season ticket holder and him being grumpy and walking by, it took me hanging at Albert Pujois restaurant at 2am tuesday morning to get an autograph. He is all smiles with the media and a camera or mike in front of him. I have seen him walk by kids at the ballpark. I would drop those 3 to the bottom. Remember, he is really not a team player as he asked to be traded. it is all fake. Tough to trade that contract is why he is here. Daniels talked to boston about him but the contract scared them too.When the incident happened, Ian offered to move to third and let Mr. Overated go back to second. It is one thing to like your team but it is more to be honest and call a spade a spade. Otherwise, Ranger fans will become like Cowboy fans, living in a planet with crazy dreams. That is, I am sure Cowboy fans think they are going to the super bowl, an unrealistic dream.

  • Chad Crudup

    Evan>>> I hate to be a smartass because I respect you and appreciate your work but… way to address my criticisms.

    Come on man, you’re better than that! Are you just going to ignore the 500lb gorilla in the room that is MY’s defensive inefficiences? What say you to the “stat-head” crowd that insists that he is worse than awful at getting to balls at 3B? Your silence on the subject lumps you in with Josh and TAG and their glowing reports on all things MY. But they are paid to sell that crap to us so I can excuse them. What is your excuse?

  • AJM

    “CJ is overated. Four losses and four blown saves would mean at least six more wins.”

    C.J. Wilson has 4 losses and 2 blown saves.

    One of the blown saves was in a game the Rangers won anyway. Another one of the blown saves was in a game where he also got the loss, so you would be counting that twice.

    So that leaves us with 4 losses that you say should be wins, not 6.

    There was the Easter Day meltdown. You can blame him for that loss.

    There were two games he got the loss in where he came in during a tie game, which means that even if he is perfect there — which you seem to expect he should be — there’s no guarantee the Rangers win.

    And the other loss was one where the Rangers scored one run all game.

    People need to get realistic about C.J. and quit acting like he’s the reincarnation of Gary Mielke. He’s been a pretty damn good reliever this year.

  • Jed E.

    For me it is hard to have MY #1 when his AVG with RISP is so bad.

  • Jack Daddy

    board beginning to sound too much like the DMN board. As i’ve said before, I fall in the middle of the scouting/stats spectrum. I watch the games with my eyes and I read the box scores and I know a good player when I know one.

    I think some of the “clubhouse/leadership” things on MY are a bit absurb (whining on the move to 3rd, trying to claim AROD never used – come on), but I also think some of the bashing of him for his performance is absurb.

    For one thing, I think we’ve gotten too far away from some of the basic stats. It bothers me that people try to discount RBIs or batting avg. Last time I checked, if you were driving in a lot of runs, you are PUTTING RUNS ON THE SCOREBOARD. If you have a low ERA, than you ARE KEEPING RUNS OFF THE SCOREBOARD. If you have a high B.A., than you are getting a lot of hits.

    There are cetain other stats that I think offers a strong mearsure of a player:

    1. B.A. RISP
    2. B.A. RISP 7th inning and later
    3. B.A. RISP 2 outs
    4. Winning percentage after a losing streak.
    5. Homeruns when the score is within 3 runs
    6. % of runners brought home from 3B with less than 1 out.

    For a very long time, MY has been one of the best at some of these “clutch” hitting stats.

    This year, Millwood has been money at #4.

    I don’t have these stats handy. I do watch just about every game and I remember ABs from 23 years ago, so I have my pretty good little computer sitting in my head.

    MY is a good ballplayer and has been one of the more clutch hitters to come through here. The last few years his range had become a big liability at SS (made more glaring by the the beast that was playing in FFrisco). He is NOT killing us at 3B and has improved in going to his left. He is terrific at coming in on balls (which happen far more than balls down the line in any given game).

    I just don’t get the venom over the guy’s play.

    Regarding Kinsler? My favorite ball player and only the 4th I’ve ever had. But his year has been largely horrible and I think his own frustration after most ABs tells you he feels the same way. His April was unreal and I don’t know what happened. I think he tried to carry this thing when Josh went down and things turned south. The fact that he has good power #s from the lead off position? Who cares. After the 1st inning, he’s not a leadoff hitter. When he does bat leadoff (in the 1st inning), you want that guy to see as many pitches as possible so the next few guys can see what the pitcher has. Its not in his DNA to do that, and that’s fine, but let’s call it what it is.

    His defense has been amazing (and saved more than a few games, including the 1st two LAA games in Arlington).

    Sorry for the rambling on.

  • Jack Daddy

    @AJM – well said on CJ.

    I think his results have been great this year. But just putting aside those — he’s shown some of the nastiest stuff I’ve seen on the mound in Arlington in a long time.

  • eddy andre

    AJM hate to tell you it scares me and other poeple when he comes in just because you throw 98 does not make you a good pitcher. he is not one. there are way better pitchers in the organization that if giving 5 years to perform could do as well. That is instead of giving them 6 games to learn give them an average of 45 games a year could be better. why people and this organization keep giving ht ball is beyond my understanding, and i did make a mistake on the 2 extra blown saves but i will research his wins one day

  • Ehren

    @Jack: I agree with your very first sentence. Are you going to be at the get together tonight?

  • Lone Ranger

    C.J. aka Head Case Wilson in the top 10? No way ever. If the first guy gets on with a one run lead its a blown save and or loss. Top 10????? give me a break.

  • Jack Daddy

    @ehren – not tonight. Too far and I didn’t like the way the last one became an autograph fest. Plus, as I learned that night, would rather keep my “heroes” separate from the real world. They lose their luster somewhat when you actually meet them. Would like to hear JD talk, but will just depress me to realize that I didn’t end up with the front office of some team.

    I will be there next Tuesday.

  • Ehren

    @Jack: Yea kind of agree with keeping the “heroes” as “heroes”. I’m in Richardson right now. Not liking the drive. I’m hoping that the autograpgh fest doesn’t happen. Really wanted to meet Murphy and JD. Maybe I’ll hit up JD for a job. :) Sorry I missed ya at the first get together.

  • Jack Daddy

    yep – i’m work downtown and live in Lake Highlands, so too much of a beating. Plus heading out there tomorrow so don’t have it in me to make the drive 2 straight nights.

  • Jed E.

    MLB website has MY batting .176 this year with RISP.

  • Rangers Fan

    1. Michael is this franchise, in my opinion. He leads and people follow. He has had a great impression on Kinsler and now Andrus. He will be #1 in my book.
    2. I wouldn’t really call him a whiner for being upset about the move to 3rd. Think about it, he had just won a gold glove, spent 5 years learning a new position and then he was moved. Think about you getting moved to a new position in your office for a new unproven guy. You’d be upset at first too. The part that counts is has done any and everything this club has asked of him and done it with class. He represents the team well.
    3. CJ is invaluable in the pen. People are always gonna hate him when he gives up a run because…well I don’t know why. But I think the powers that be know what they have in him.
    4. Kinsler- I think he gets on fire soon. He wants to be a leader (and he is) but to me it seems like he got caught with a case of trying to do too much and account for Josh’s absence. It backfired and tired him out. He’ll rebound.
    5. Is it Friday yet?

  • Jack Daddy

    @jed e – i know. to me, one of the 2 biggest head-scratchers this year (along with Ian’s swoon since may).

  • Troy Boy

    Boy-o-boy where do I start?
    Mr. Young is an absolute fraud. Yes he is a very good hitter but his defense is atrocious, embarrassing to say the least. Zero range, left or right, nothing that shows up in the box score but ball after ball gets by him that are well within the reach of an average major league third baseman (at least Blaylock would dive at them). Yes he does make the routine plays but all professionals make the routine plays that’s why they’re in the big leagues.
    That soft line drive that Ichiro hit off of Holland in Seattle, how is possible for Mr. Young not to make that catch. Major leaguers make that catch with their eyes shut. When has he made a play “coming in” or “going out” that was not made everyday in the majors. To be a winner you have be more than just average.
    To top all this off Mr. Young does not not want to be accountable or responsible for anything that happens, “losing” for example. The Rangers often don”t lose games, they give them away with sloppy play or lack of fundamentals. We don”t expect perfection but we would like to see a batter hit behind the runner in order to advance him, or get a bunt down, or hit a cutoff man, or run the bases like he knew what a cutoff man was, or lose the mentality that I going to swing as hard as I can and hit it as far as I can.
    “Well the breaks went against us today, we’ll see what happen tomorrow”. No Mr. Young, you played dumb, at times stupid baseball and tried to hit 800 feet home runs. That’s ok Mr. Young, your players manager that you gush so much about will tell your how wonderful you are and pat you on your little head. He dare not coach you, or have high expectation for your performance, remember that tirade Buck Showalter.

  • ftwfrog

    Kinsler may be the worst lead-off man in baseball. Swings at the first pitch, pops up more times than not, and is a terrible situational hitter. Yes, Kinsler’s numbers look good, but a leadoff man isn’t supposed to WOW you with 30 homers, but hit .250. He’s supposed to take pitches, let his other hitters get a feel for the pitcher; as well as GET ON BASE!!! Not fly out to left.

  • JRB

    @ftwfrog: Well, at least he is flying out to right a lot more lately. I guess that’s something!

  • Blake Perkins

    Guardado ahead of Jennings? You have got to be kidding!

  • Troy Boy

    Mr. Frog, You are exactly correct about Kinsler. Someone, anyone, please tell him he’s hitting leadoff, not clean up.
    His defense has improved greatly, he’s making the routine plays and sometimes the above average or even the great play to take a base hit away. Unfortunately, he tries to “yank” everything to left (yank as into the stands). Apparently he’s never heard the phrase “use the whole field” or “hit it where it’s pitched”.
    I’m sure he is a very nice young man, he certainly appears to be, but maybe hardheaded and stubborn. Hopefully he learn.

  • Terry

    Wow. Lots of strong opinions. Having watched the Rangers for a number of years, not all of which were winning years, I often decide this question by asking who do I want to see play on the nights I go to a game? Who is the guy that makes me buy a ticket? There are several on this team, but Michael Young is at the top of the list. A Leader. A Man. The Godfather of this team. I think the top 10 here could always be rearranged in different ways, but they are all guys I would pay to see play. Now if some get hot in the 2nd half, all the better!

  • Juboon

    I agree — wow. All this passion and venom, you’d think the team was having to reach up to grab the stairs out of the cellar. ;)

  • Troy Boy

    Terry,
    Michael Young a leader, now that’s a stretch. Mr. Young avoids anything close to leadership like the plague. Keep drinking that Kool-aid and let me know when the Rangers win something while he’s still in town.
    Don’t be blinded by his base hits. Watch the other things he does, better yet watch the things he doesn’t do.
    Will Clark, Mickey Tettleton, Rusty Greer, Mark McLemore would eat him alive.

  • eddy andre

    heroes sounds kind of gay to me plus this generation ballplayers have nothing to be a hero. jackie robinson was a hero, hank aaron was a hero, ted williams a two time war hero, bob feller a war heo
    these players do not belong in a hero status and like I satated everytime i read that guy with our”heroes” and does not want it to be an autograph session it make sme wondr if he is a baseball fan
    if u dont want autographs go watch a vogue modeling session
    meeting players and getting autographs are what 98 percent of what fans want except maybe this Jack Daddy guy sounds very gay just wanting to stare at the “heroes”
    if you want to just not get autographs dont if you just a talk session go to their numerous talk sessions
    this team is not very autograph friendly except for Josh and Derek so any opportunity is great Iam not a sller there are many guys who go who are but I have been collecting for 45 years and in this day and time this is the best the rangers do in that aspect

  • Jack Daddy

    @eddy – couple of things:

    1. Have at the autographs. simply said I wouldn’t be there. I think its great they’re putting this one (did i ever say they didn’t)?
    2. notice the quotes around heroes. The point i was making is that I like to keep the “mystique” or “aura” or whatever you want to call it with the ballplayers that I watch on tv. when i have tended to meet them, I routinely discover that they aren’t that “neat” or impressive.
    3. I’m surprised your being critical of the use of the word “heroe” when your chasing their autograph. Clearly you distinguish them from the guy that works at Jersey Mikes and makes your sandwiches. Unless of course you chase his autograph also.
    4. If you find out where they are having a vogue modeling session in town, let me know –sounds awesome.

  • Evan Grant

    @ALL: First, I am sitting here completely exhausted, drained and, at the same time, thrilled over your attendance and participation at Pappasito’s tonight. This has been a difficult and challenging year for me on a lot of fronts, but the connection with this community has been, by far, the most rewarding.

    That said, let’s offer up a few responses:

    @Chad: Bottom line, I just don’t buy the argument that Young is a horrible defender. Are there guys with more range at third? Sure. I just see a guy who, for me, is the package of what a winning ballplayer should be. Is that a mancrush? If that’s what you want to call it. No player ever does everything above average. For me, Young plays the game and treats the game the way I want to see it. I see him in the clubhouse and I talk to him about the clubhouse and my sense just tells me this is a special player on a number of fronts. I did vacillate between Millwood and Young, but, at the end, Millwood’s last two starts made me hedge a little.

    @ALL: Is it possible, I under-ranked Cruz and the back-end-of-the-bullpen trio? Yep, fully possible. Never said this last was the be-all and end-all. It’s a place to start conversation and, for the most part, that conversation and discussion has been civil, intelligent and eye-opening.

    That said, I just don’t ever get the need for calling of names. That’s not what this is about. It’s all about passion and discussion and debate, but I know it’s possible to debate without calling people names.

    Thanks again, folks for all you do to make this place something special. We may have set up this little “Corner” of the world, but your investments in terms of emotion and energy is what really makes things interesting.

    I offer you my own standing ovation.

  • Rangers Fan

    Man, after reading some of these comments you’d think we’re accustomed to winning baseball for years.

    My only other thought on Young is that to call him overrated is to say that players and managers all over this league don’t know what they’re talking about. He is the #1 guy at his position in that vote every year. He’s not getting in on a popularity contest. He deserves it, according to a whole bunch of guys that know a ton more about baseball than us.

    About Kinsler..worst lead off? I’ll have to disagree with that. Is he your average powerless hitter? No. Can he hit? Yes. Does he have power? Yes. So you want him to change how he plays because he hits 1st? No. You don’t change how you play because of where you hit. You play your game and let your manger place you where he sees fit. As I’ve said before, I don’t think Kinsler’s swing has changed. I don’t think he goes up there trying to hit homeruns. That’s now how he plays. I think he’s shown signs of coming out of the slump so hopefully with rest that continues.

  • Tom B

    A hundred games into the season is the proper place to do a “Pop-Up Orientation” to assess where the Rangers are and expect to go. We’re close but these next ten days to two weeks will start separating the wheat from the chaff. August and September will find some players performing less effectively, especially young players, and we have several. Kins has gone down about every year in the 2nd half. SS and Catcher are two positions that will require precautions. Teagarden and Visquel are positioned to pick-up some of the slack. 1B has already cratered and a second wave may overtake the replacement. I’m not sure I go to war with A. Jones but he does have experience if also diminished skills. Be glad if you see .500 baseball in the last two months and cherish the reserves in OKC and Frisco. Several could really show BIG before it is all said and done. I love this ‘Corner.’ The question is, “Can there be Passion w/o idiocy?” Let’s not go “Cowboy Crazy.”