There is more than plenty of talk about what Jason Garrett should do with the offense this season. I happen to agree that the number #1 factor for the Cowboys is health this season; but #2 is how well Jason Garrett coordinates his offense.
Honestly, I thought he was poor last season. I thought his play calls were often to appease some; for instance Terrell Owens gets 18 targets (Washington, Week 4) which led to Felix Jones not getting a touch. I also thought he relied on the shotgun and the pass too much when a game began to develop. When you are down 14, sling the ball without regard for caution or care, but when you are down 3 in the 3rd Quarter, there is no reason to abandon your game plan. But, the facts indicate that the Cowboys were too willing to throw the ball early and often and that gets everyone in trouble.
It gets your QB hit too often, it puts too much pressure on your OL, it allows the defense to “pin their ears back” and disregard the running game. And if you review the games in December, you will see the disregard grew.
The Cowboys threw the ball 59.1% of the time in 2008 (579 passes/400 runs) – only 4 teams in football threw more often. Playoff teams in 2008 threw the ball 52.7% of the time. The difference? 64 run plays. 4 a week. The Cowboys averaged 61.1 offensive snaps in 2008, and the average split was 36 passes and 25 runs.
But, in December? The Cowboys passed 65.5% of the time! (252 plays, 85 runs) I realize they were behind at Philadelphia, but they were never behind in Pittsburgh until the end, they led the Giants the entire way, and were in a dog fight with the Ravens most of the way. Did they abandon it because all they had was Tashard Choice healthy? Quite possibly, but regardless of their rationale, the opponents did not worry about the run at all and blitzed Tony Romo with reckless abandon. This caused all sorts of chaos for the Cowboys and made the OL look like it was no longer interested in doing its job.
As we look to 2009, we all agree the ratio must be better. Last season, the Cowboys ran the ball in the 1st half of games just 39% of the time (ranks 28th). They ranked 22nd on running the ball on 1st down – playoff teams ran the ball on 1st down 56.2% and the Cowboys ran the ball on 1st down 47.8%.
If they have the ball for 61 snaps, they need to target 32 passes/29 runs to get the ratio right and keep defenses honest. This starts with personnel groups. Too often, Garrett was too happy to throw caution to the wind, the running game out the window, and go strictly shotgun. There were games where the Cowboys played Shotgun/3 WRs for the entire 2nd half – of games they didn’t trail! In that Redskins home game in week 4, they ran 58 plays and 47 were passes (81%) – and all 3 RBs were healthy!! In the blowout win over the 49ers, the Cowboys still insisted on passing 41 times! Why? And in the Ravens game, the run/pass split was 21/47 – despite this being a game that was 9-7 at halftime. Basically, it appeared the Cowboys thought they were playing Madden on their XBox (For people that don’t play video games: Nobody “establishes the run” in Madden – it is pass, pass, pass).
And, remember: You aren’t running the ball to appease people with calculators. You are doing it to control the clock, rest your defense, and make passing easier. You are doing it to help your QB, your OL, and move field position.
With that in mind, we must go back to personnel groups. Below, please find the Cowboys offense broken down by personnel groups.
For any of this to make sense, you have to know what all of the different packages mean. Basically, it is very simple. Every Offense in the world has 1 QB and 5 Offensive Linemen. Therefore, if 11 players are on the field, then that leaves 5 players who can join the QB in skill positions and the Offensive Coordinator has to choose how to deploy those 5. So, the groups are simple. “11″ means 1 RB and 1 TE, so you add those 2 numbers together (1+1 = 2) and subtract that number from 5 to get how many WRs are on the field at the time. (11 will mean 3 WRs, of course).
| Personnel Package | Description |
| 11 | 1 RB, 1 TE, 3 WR |
| 12 | 1 RB, 2 TE, 2 WR |
| 13 | 1 RB, 3 TE, 1 WR |
| 21 | 2 RB, 1 TE, 2 WR |
| 22 | 2 RB, 2 TE, 1 WR |
| 23 | 2 RB, 3 TE |
| S11 | Shotgun, 1 RB, 1 TE, 3 WR |
| S12 | Shotgun, 1 RB, 2 TE, 2 WR |
Do you get it? In all of the packages, the first number is the number of RBs, the second number is the total number of TEs. And “S” means Shotgun. And when you watch the game on tv, you can easily identify the package before the snap to see what Garrett is doing.
Now, check the 2008 results for personnel packages according to my figures:
Now, let’s break down the pie chart above. I broke down all 979 plays the Cowboys ran last year into Personnel groupings. I found 8 looks that accounted for at least 1% of the plays (if they ran it at least 10 times, you will see it here). There are several other looks they showed fewer than 10 times, but to try to fight against making your head spin, let’s try to keep it simple.
So, here they are:
| Package | Plays Run | Yards | Percentage |
| 11 | 27 | 115 | 2.7% |
| 12 | 170 | 856 | 17.3% |
| 13 | 44 | 310 | 4.4% |
| 21 | 173 | 958 | 17.6% |
| 22 | 92 | 375 | 10% |
| 23 | 9 | 6 | 1% |
| S11 | 385 | 2594 | 39.3% |
| S12 | 30 | 141 | 3.1% |
| Other | 41 | 188 | 5% |
So, as you can see, the majority of the Cowboys Offense was in 3 Personnel Groups:
“21″ – This was generally a package that included a FB (Deon Anderson) blocking for Marion Barber and just 1 Tight End. They ran 173 plays with this set, with 108 runs/65 passes. The troubling result is that despite this being a “power run” set, they ran for only 3.52 runs a carry. 380 yards on 108 runs was not good enough.
“12″ – This is my package of choice. To me, this should be the base look for their offense in 2009. With Martellus Bennett on the field, they can balance the offense. They ran 170 plays with 2 TEs and the QB under center. 77 runs/93 passes with the 77 runs reaping 5.14 yards per carry. The defense doesn’t know what is coming, so if I have to choose between Martellus on the field or Deon Anderson, I am going with a dual threat. And don’t forget, you can always have 2 TEs on the field and still deploy Witten or Bennett as a “F” or “H” back where Anderson would normally stand.
“S11″ – And here is the love of Jason Garrett’s offense. Every time the Cowboys are in 3rd down, unless it is 3rd and very short, you can guarantee your friends the Cowboys will be in Shotgun, with 3 WRs and 1 RB. They ran this 385 times in 2008! Of the 385 snaps, 320 were pass plays (83%) so you know the defenses were not worried about the occasional delay or draw play. Romo is pretty effective in this set, but it also gets him hit plenty. Usually in shotgun, the Cowboys send Witten out in a pattern, so it is the 5 OL + Barber/Choice to pass block. And it gets your QB killed. In 2009, they have to depend on this look much, much less than nearly 40%.
So there you have it. Enough data to make your head spin, but on Tuesdays during the season, we will visit that week’s game plan. Before long, you will be on your couch calling out the personnel group in pre-snap and driving your wife even more crazy.
Enjoy. And yes, I have all of the data from 2008, so if you have follow up questions about other results, feel free to post them below:
Bob, the pie graph has taken you to another level.
Oh yeah, the article is spot on, too.
god almighty….c’mon….too much cowboy talk….too many stats…this is supposed to be baseball-intensive…evan grant is supposed to be the spearcarrier of this thing….how’s about a little more him?…less this?
I’m a big fan of the 12 package (not s12) with Romo under center. It’s a balanced set that’s more condusive to running the ball. The linemen can fire off and drive block and the RB can run down hill. The safetys and OLBs will be tormented by the big, athletic freaks we have playing TE, which should put the CBs truly on an island in single coverage. If that happens, the CBs will play off and the hitch pass becomes a staple, as it’s basically a no risk seven yard handoff. If the safetys have deep outside, Bennett and Witten will arse-rape the OLBs, so don’t look for a lot of cover 2. This set will make DC’s earn their paycheck.
BTW, I’d like to see a lot more WR motion as well (think Tom Landry). More than than looking really kick-ass, (think Drew Pearson) this should help Romo with the pre-snap read and make it more difficult for the defense to disguise what they’re doing.
Let’s set the over/under for the 12 package at 55% and pray for the over…
@rhyner”evan grant is supposed to be the spearcarrier”
You sir, is a racialist…
I completely agree about running more, but even JG is still a little pass happy, that’s fine as long as he cuts down on the long passes.
S11 with 6 guys in protection doesn’t bother me if Romo doesn’t have to hang on the the ball for 6 seconds waiting for the routes to develop.
Also, the coaches need to encourage Romo to scramble a bit when nothing is open. Seeing the QB take a nice relaxed 6 yard jog for a first down rips the hearts out of the defense, extends drives, and will cut down on INT’s and QB fumbles.
Sports Sturm needs to change his name to Stats Sturm.
Stop being so thin-skinned, Bob.
As usual, excellent work my friend. I agree wholeheartedly with your assessment of Garrett being under the microscope more in 2009, and that he needs to change his offensive scheme to accommodate the talent of our players.
I will still be anxious to see, which I don’t think was answered watching the pre-season games, if this will be a pass-first offense like in 2008 or a run-first offense. But the 12 is so unpredictable it may not matter in that formation.
I would add that I like the idea of Romo under center more than the Shotgun because you can use his great mobility as a QB more. I am picturing Romo in the 12 Formation in a play-action pass Romo rolling to his right with both Bennett and Witten running patterns across with him. I just don’t see how this play can be stopped. Maybe the NFL has a LB that’s fast enough or a Safety big enough to cover these 2 guys…I just haven’t seen it yet.
You have the ’08 stats, but the ’07 offense was a thing to behold. Do you have anything from that year to compare?
You’re right though, far too much shotgun in ’08. That shouldn’t be your base offense, but it was. Hasn’t worked since Houston in ’93.
I wonder how much of it has to do with Proctor and an injured Adams, however?
This is still a team that will pass more than run, in a league that will pass more than run. Right now, though, the biggest strength on the team is in the backfield and you have to deploy your resources in a manner that gets the best guys in the best places.
Back to last year, I bet part of the rationale was that there’s not many good nicklebacks in the game, and by getting a weaker player on the field you think you have more mis-matches. I think you can accomplish that this year, by splitting MartyB, Witten or Felix out wide. If you can force the D into the nickle and have your 22 on the field, you’ve just won the matchup game.
I’d look for more of 22 this year, with lots of pre-snap motion.
Bob,
Now, you are just scaring me.
very impressive bob. thanks for all your hard work.
The S11 package (according to these stats) gained roughly 25% more yards per play than the next most successful package (package 21 @ 958 yrds). You go with what works the most as often as you can, that’s package S11.
“You’re right though, far too much shotgun in ‘08. That shouldn’t be your base offense, but it was. Hasn’t worked since Houston in ‘93.”
I agree ’12′ personnel should be the strength of this offense but I absolutely don’t agree that 3 WR shotgun sets can’t be successful at this level. Perhaps that is not the strength of THIS team but see the 2007 Patriots for a team that throws 60% of the time out of 3 WR Shotgun sets.
Bob, my god thats a lot of words…i only read the first couple of sentences then scrolled down and saw the pie chart…i didn’t read that either.
I think that Garret might tweak his approach a little this year but from what i heard troy say the other day is that Garrett wants to pass first to open it up for the run. Like I said, Garret might tweak a little but i think this is what he really wants to do. But like you said this can make you vulnurable(no spell check)as a game goes on especially if your defense gives up points early, then you have to pass more.
The other point I’d like to make is that as much as everybody wants this team to run more and get all these running backs the ball(felix esp) which i agree with is that this o-line is not that great at run blocking. Call me crazy and i definitely haven’t looked at the numbers like you have but i think alot of the running numbers they have gotten have come a little later in games when Garrets plan has played out like he wanted to(pass to open the middle up).
[...] Definition of the Personnel Groups, click here . [...]
Bob, thanks for making this football 301 stuff accessible to the masses (and for making your pie charts Easter colors).
[...] Definition of the Personnel Groups, click here . [...]
[...] Definition of the Personnel Groups, click here . [...]
Bob,
You are the greatest. Keep the stats coming, it really helps in understanding the game.
[...] Definition of the Personnel Groups, click here . [...]
[...] Definition of the Personnel Groups, click here . [...]
[...] Definition of the Personnel Groups, click here . [...]
[...] Definition of the Personnel Groups, click here . [...]