A seemingly eternally-cursed franchise received a bit of heaven-sent help last week.
The Rangers, true to their star-crossed history, ignored it. And you know what they say: It’s not nice to fool with Mother Nature.
When this season is officially put away for the winter, the ultimate reason it will be the 10th consecutive season without a playoff appearance is going to sting a lot. Like hard raindrops in a stiff, cold wind. It will sting not because of anything the Rangers did on the field. It very likely will be because of what they did to the field. In an effort to preserve the integrity of the home schedule – and to keep the gate money – the Rangers implored the hard-working grounds crew to somehow got the field playable enough for three games with Seattle on a weekend when nearly 9.5 inches of rain fell on Arlington. That they did is a testament to the grounds crew. That the Rangers played, though, is a testament to the business of baseball and nothing else.
The Rangers lost two of those three games and have been sleep-walking ever since. If they aren’t careful, they are about to step right off a cliff and out of what remains of the AL playoff races. Now, some four days after the flood, it’s at least worth considering whether the Rangers simply should have simply accepted the watery gift they received as a blessing and played the three games in Seattle at the end of the season when their roster was back at full strength.
The simple answer is no. Home games are precious, too, and they aren’t to be tossed about willy-nilly. The Rangers are 16 games over .500 at home – even after losing their last three. They are a .500 club on the road.
As always seems to be the case with this team, though, nothing is as simple as it sounds.
Even before the Rangers returned home to start a swing through the AL West that is to culminate with a three-game showdown against the Angels this weekend, the heavens were playing havoc with them. The Rangers sat through a long rain delay in Cleveland on Labor Day and rescheduled as part of a twi-night doubleheader the next day. That would allow the Indians, who are out of the race and in it for the money, to maximize their gate from a mid-week September game. It also meant the Rangers would have to play three times in 19 hours because the game following the hastily scheduled doubleheader was set for noon on Sept. 9. Amazingly, the Rangers swept through the three games, scoring at least 10 runs in all three and then headed home for the big homestand.
After an off-day, the Rangers arrived at Rangers Ballpark and sat through two and a half hours of delays before the game was called and rescheduled as part of a doubleheader on Sunday. On Saturday, with a crummy forecast, the Rangers somehow found enough of a window to start the game, but it began raining midway through a loss that included an hour long delay at the tail end. The doubleheader on Sunday, scheduled for noon, didn’t get underway until five. That will throw off your body clock a bit. The Rangers won the first game, but have scored exactly one run since. They simply look like a team that hasn’t recovered from a hectic week’s worth of scheduling and rescheduling.
They have fallen 5.5 games back in the wild card, their biggest deficit of the year in that race. They haven’t made up an inch of ground in the AL West race (a six-game deficit), even though Los Angeles has lost three of its last four.
“You are prepared to play every single day,” said OF David Murphy of the lost weekend. “It does get tougher, though, when you are constantly just sitting around the clubhouse. At the same time, Seattle had to deal with it, too. I’m not going to say that it didn’t affect us, but there are some things we need to learn to overcome. We’ve just been flat.”
So, now, in hindsight, it’s easy to question whether the Seattle series should have been played at all.
The biggest reason to say “yes” is financial. And financial reasons are a huge part of why the Rangers do anything these days, especially since MLB is holding a $15 million IOU from the troubled Hicks Sports Group.
Had the series, or any part thereof, been postponed, the Rangers only viable option was to play them in Seattle as part of the last series of the season.The Rangers would have been the designated “home” team for any makeup games in Seattle, but they also would have lost out on significant gate receipts. Staring a very austere offseason budget in the face, the Rangers need to make as much money as possible in September to avoid more drastic limitations.
Also, three doubleheaders in three days would have potentially had a negative impact on the Rangers’ readiness for the post-season. About that, we have this to say: Before the Rangers can concern themselves with what their chances in the post-season, they first have to qualify for the post-season. In hindsight, it seems like their best chance at qualifying for the post-season would have involved calling the weekend’s games as soon as possible, agreeing to play them in Seattle and waiting to get their roster back to full strength.
Shifting the entire series to Seattle, if necessary, wouldn’t have been nearly as burdensome to the Rangers playoff hopes as it sounds. First, there is every possibility that Michael Young and Josh Hamilton will both be back and both at full strength by then. Second, there is this mathematical equation: No games in Arlington + six games in Seattle in three days = Only one start against Felix Hernandez. Finally, there is the motivation. If the Rangers were still legitimately in the race come those three days, the Mariners, just looking to go home, would have approached the games with all the enthusiasm of getting a Swine Flu shot.
Instead, the Rangers did great work at getting the field in shape and at getting the games in on the dates that were originally scheduled.
Sadly, their reward may just end up being another October vacation.
“Sadly, their reward may just end up being another October vacation.”
From what I saw last night, and the night before, I think that is exactly what they want.
Bravo Evan for this piece—-your insight and thought is much appreciated.
One run in their last 28 innings and a 2-6 streak v. Baltimore, Seattle, Oakland where they scored only 20 runs.
Somehow this team did well in August with Cruz & Kinsler gone and also found a way to score 30+ runs in Cleveland last week so I am not going to blame the absences of Young & Hamilton for the team not scoring.
Evan, foresee any notable line-up changes tonight or do you think we will be banging our heads on a wall again and hoping it will feel different?
Excellent hindsight analysis!
The title of this post should have been “Heaven help us: Rangers AND EVAN overlooked sign from above…”. On Satuday around noon Evan seemed to be in agreement with the Rangers ultimate decision to play the games here when he posted: “The last thing the Rangers can afford to do, both competitively and financially, is play fewer games at home than the schedule calls for.”
If we are using hindsight analysis, I believe Feldman should have been pulled after the 4th inning in his latest start, and perhaps Michael Young should have taken another day off as well.
I know a way the Rangers can save $12 million next season.
@Jordan: Great point, but that’s the beauty of hindsight. It makes your vision so much more clear.
Thanks for catching me in a waffle. I did feel Saturday it was important for them to try and play. I don’t think on Sunday I would have advocated waiting five hours.
Evan, foresee any notable line-up changes tonight or do you think we will be banging our heads on a wall again and hoping it will feel different?
excellent insight evan. during the usc drive the other night against ohio state the commentator noted that no one prepares their team better at being loose than pete carroll. i have to think that all hicks problems and the dfa’ing of padilla leaving no punching boy and millwood’s implosion, young and hamilton’s injuries has left the dugout in a mood that is nothing short of “extremely tight”……….and if you’re a young pitcher you might be tight to after looking at how nolan’s plan has helped millwood………..
geez the entire franchise from top to bottom is extremely tight…..geez the grounds crews are tight if they don’t have the funds to do the job right and the concession workers are tight if they have no fans to sell to…….and even the best of fans have to look at the state of the franchise and be extremely tight………
i’m just going to go take an atavan and try to calm down over this ownership/management tightness……….
I think there are only so many rabbits in a magician’s hat. It seems the Rangers have hit bottom. If they are considering recovery they better enjoy a hare raising event.
@Josey: Don’t see any notable lineup changes in store for tonight. Maybe your guy Blalock gets a chance against Trevor Cahill, but it’s not like he’s a markedly better option than Chris Davis. Blalock is 1-for-6 with a homer against Cahill; Davis is 1-for-3 with a homer.
@Evan: I thought the rangers would return to texas to play seattle at the end of the season to make up any games they wouldve poastponed last weekend. And I’m in total agreement with you that the decision to play for the purpose of gate money was a terrible idea; I think playoff gate wouldve brought in a lot more money!
@AB: The possibility of returning to Texas to play more than one game was not feasible due to the playoff schedule. If there was one game to play, it was a possible to consider playing it in Texas, but that still could have played havoc with the post-season schedule. So, the most realistic option would have been to play in Seattle.
[...] night at SideDish Supper Club, I still feel the same way I did earlier this week. Mainly, I think last week’s wet weather and weird scheduling sapped energy from the Rangers. I just don’t think they’ve recovered. There have been technical reasons, too. A club could [...]