D

Live Blog Feed


Football 301: Decoding Garrett – Week 2

mathDISCLAIMER: This is not for everyone. It may not be for you. This is a statistical study of the Cowboys offense with lots of numbers that may make your head tired if you are not up to it. Read it only if it is something that is of interest to you.

Well, I know the hurt is still there for many fans of the Cowboys, but just know as you read this that the Cowboys coaching staff has already digested the Giants film and today will put the finishing touches on the Panthers’ game plan.

The Giants game will be remembered by many of us as a failure, but success versus failure in the National Football League sometimes comes down to a simple field goal attempt with no time left on the clock after 3 hours of two teams killing each-other.  The basic truth is this:  In every game, there is good to consider and bad to avoid.  And Sunday night, the Cowboys did some wonderful things.  But, it only takes one untimely lapse in judgement from either your QB or your Offensive Coordinator to get you beat.  That is the point of this Tuesday Series here at Inside Corner.  To examine where they got it right, and where they got it wrong during each Cowboys game.

You likely do not require this breakdown to realize a few things: 1) The passing game, regardless of personnel package, has not looked that bad since Brad Johnson was working his magic. and 2) When running the ball, it worked in pretty much every look. But “22″, was very impressive. 58 snaps, and 28 snaps (48%) included at least 2 Tight Ends – so it wasn’t straight “12″, but they continue to use Witten and Bennett as big parts of what they do.

Let’s visit about “22″ this week. This week, the Cowboys used it more than any other package in their base offense (S11 is the standard 2-minute offense and therefore will generally always have the highest numbers).

“22″ means that the Cowboys deploy 2 Running Backs (Barber or Jones, and the FB Deon Anderson) and both tight ends (80 and 82). This obviously is a power running set that allows you to do a number of things andmakes the opponent second guess what it puts out there. If they leave their standard defense out there, there is a chance that you can get a hat on a hat in the running game and roll through some big plays. 10 Run plays out of the “22″ and the Cowboys rolled up 121 yards. Barber broke a 25 yarder, andFelix Jones busted a 56 yard run, both out of this set.

Totals by Personnel Groups:

Package Plays Run Yards Run Pass
12 4 38 4-38 0-0
13 2 8 0-0 2-8
21 10 39 6-34 4-5
22 16 132 10-121 6-11
23 1 0 1-0 0-0
S11 16 101 5-45 11-56
S12 5 21 2-7 3-14
Other 4 36 1-3 3-33
Totals 58 378 29-251 29-127

Table Tutorial

Definition of the Personnel Groups, click here .

“Other” this week represented 4 snaps. Early in the game, Garrett rolled out “31″ on a 2nd down and 1 yard to go with Choice, Jones, and Barber all on the field at the same time. “S01″ was run twice – this is a shotgun set with 0 RBs and 1 TE (so all 4 active WRs were on the field) – that yielded 2 plays for 20 yards which was the 20 yard catch to Austin down the middle. The final new personnel look Garrett used on Sunday night was 1 snap out of a “S21″ – Shotgun with Barber, Jones, Witten, and 2 WRs. This was on a key 3rd and 8 in the 4th Quarter where Romo hit Witten for 13 yards near midfield. Look for more out of this look at certain times down the road because it really stretches the defense to account for 28, 24, and82 underneath.

Big Plays:

1st Q – 3/10/D24 – In “S11″, Pass to Crayton, Interception by Johnson for Touchdown
3rd Q – 1/10/N47 – In “21″, Pass to Hurd, Interception by Phillips
3rd Q – 1/10/D16 – In “22″, Run to Jones, 56 yards
4th Q – 2/6/N41 – In “S11″, Run draw to Barber, 34 yards

Video Breakdowns:

Last week, we got some great feedback on our video breakdowns. Once again, I want to thank Brian at DC Fanatic.com and I greatly appreciate his technical abilities and willingness to spend his own time in putting this stuff on video for us to digest. Please go visit him when you can.

Also, another Cowboys fan, Shawn in Florida, deserves recognition for compiling some various numbers over the years (and emailing me with better Cowboys observations than most) and I want to thank him before we go on. Anyway, here we go – and this week, we need to look at some of the bad:

—————————————————–

The Play:1st Q – 3/10/D24 – In “S11″, Pass to Crayton, Interception by Johnson for Touchdown

What Happened:S11 on 3rd and Long. Witten and Austin to Romo’s left; Williams and Crayton on Romo’s Right with Crayton in the slot. Chances are, the Cowboys had one thing called in the huddle, and then when the Giants have 7 guys on the line in pre-snap, Romo audibles to something a bit more safe. Then, the Giants appear to counter his audible with one of their own, as Antonio Pierce calls of the blitz (which obviously is Man coverage) andswitches the Giants to a zone underneath look. Check Mate. Romo did not have time to change the play a 3rd time, so he runs what they called. At this time, he must concede the play and throw it out of bounds and take a punt. He does not. He tries to make a perfect throw, and unless it is 100% perfect, it is getting picked. Punts are good. Picks are bad. Especially bad if it is returned for a Touchdown because you did this at your own 24 yard line. Very, very poor.

Some have asked me if he should have taken Roy on the slant underneath, but I think Pierce blows that up, too. I think the safe play is the punt at this spot on the field.

————————————————————

The Play:3rd Q – 1/10/N47 – In “21″, Pass to Hurd, Interception by Phillips

What Happened: Remember last week, the Cowboys ran “21″ personnel 11 times and ran out of it 10 times. I was sure that Garrett had a play-action ambush planned out of this look, and here it was. But, it backfired badly. The Cowboys lead here 24-20 late in the 3rd Quarter. The biggest issue here is it is 1st and 10 and the Cowboys were running the football with ease. Ending this drive in the end-zone may put the game away, so you understand the desire to go for the “Kill shot”.

The premise of the play is very simple. Play fake to Barber and go over the top to Hurd. If the Giants are playing like a team that has been getting gashed on the ground (The Cowboys had just run for 84 yards in the last drive!), then they are expected to crash the line of scrimmage with the safeties and linebackers. Why was Kenny Phillips playing the deepest pre-snap safety anyone has ever seen? Why was he expecting this play on 1st and 10 when the Cowboys hadn’t take a deep shot all night? Was it too obvious that the call was coming? Did they steal a sign? I have no idea.

But, Tony has to see his key. On a deep pass like this, the key is the deep safety. Brian added some audio here that is very telling and also, the Ed Reed interception from last winter. Good football X’s and O’s. And a big tip of the hat to Bill Sheridan, the Giants new Defensive Coordinator. Sometimes, a great idea doesn’t work. Here it was.

—————————————————————–

The Play: 1st Q – 1/10/N40 – “22″ personnel – Barber run for 25 yards

What Happened: This video is joined by animation by Brian! Sunday night, as the Cowboys were on their 2nd drive, it became clear that they were running the same play on the Barber 25 yard run and then 2 plays later on the touchdown run. Check it out. “22″ – with Bennett and Witten on the right showing a pass look. Then, in pre snap, Bennett crosses Witten back towards Colombo. It looks like the play is designed to either go Gurode and Davis in the “A” gap, or between Davis and Colombo in the “B” gap, with Barber having the liberty to cut back if the Giants over-pursue.

The first play, he does sense the Giants LBs over ran the play (Watch #52 Boley, the WLB go too far to his left, and #65 Gurode bulldoze him further out of position), so he headed back to Kosier/Adams. Kosier gets a good seal, and Barber is off. On the Touchdown, Barber just follows Big Len. Same play, run twice in 3 snaps, and run very well.

——————————————

The Play: 2/10/D16 – “22″ personnel, Felix runs for 56 yards

What Happened:Another “22″ look, with Bennett off Right Tackle, and Witten in motion across to the left. Watch Witten’s motion taking one safety out of the run defense, and now, the LBs sense that the play is going to the Cowboys strong side (right). Once again, #52 Boley gets caught up in the wash, and when Felix cuts back, Deon Anderson doesn’t even have anyone to block. Then, Felix can easily get up on the Safety Phillips who takes a bad angle and is lost in space against someone of Jones’ speed. 2 snaps later, they ran this same play with Jones, and it burst for another 15 yards.

The “22″ is interesting, because it seems like you always have plenty of blockers, and the RBs can run to daylight. I would expect that this is another way to utilize 2 TEs down the road.

Target Distribution:

This will demonstrate why pregame talk and pregame articles are just guesses. I looked closely at this matchup, and it seemed obvious that they Cowboys should have great success going to wide outs because the Giants have horrid healthy in their secondary. Without Aaron Ross and Kevin Dockery, and withboth safeties being gimpy, it would seem that Williams, Crayton, and friends should be able to make some big plays, right?

Wow. 5-18 to Crayton, Williams, Hurd, Austin, and Bennett. Basically, anyone downfield not named Witten had almost no success on Sunday night. And, against a depleted Giants secondary on a night where the Giants were unable to get to Romo with pass rush? Amazing. Reminds you of the Seattle playoff game when the Seahawks pulled Pete Hunter out of a Dallas mortgage office and the Cowboys could not take advantage of that, either. And, let’s not forget that Romo to Witten caused the “Heel INT” on Sunday night, so that wasn’t perfect either.

Targets – Week 2 vs NYG

Name Targets Catches Yards FD/TD
Witten 7 5 33 1/1
Crayton 7 1 4 0/0
Williams 4 1 18 1/0
Bennett 4 1 11 1/0
Barber 2 2 31 1/0
Hurd 2 1 7 0/0
Austin 1 1 20 1/0
Choice 1 1 3 1/0
Jones 1 0 0 0/0
Totals 29 13 127 6/1

Table Tutorial

Season Target Distribution To Date:

Name Targets Catches Yards FD/TD
Witten 14 10 104 5/1
Crayton 13 5 139 1/1
Williams 11 4 104 2/1
Bennett 6 2 24 2/0
Choice 3 3 9 1/0
Austin 3 2 62 1/1
Hurd 2 1 7 0/0
Barber 2 2 31 1/0
Jones 1 0 0 0/0
Anderson 1 0 0 0/0
Totals 56 29 480 13/4

Table Tutorial

3rd Down Target Distribution:

3rd down targets are key to see what Romo does on a “make-or-break” down. Who does he trust? Who gets open when they need it? 15 3rd down throws for Romo this season – with success (either a first down or a touchdown) on just 5 of them. Of those 5, 4 go to Jason Witten. The fifth success was a dump off to Tashard Choice for 3 yards. And on Sunday, Roy Williams did not even get a ball thrown his way on 3rd down. Hmmm.

3RD Down Targets – Week 2 – NYG

Name Targets Catches Yards FD/TD
Witten 2 2 14 1/1
Crayton 3 1 4 0/0
Choice 1 1 3 1/0
Bennett 1 0 0 0/0
Totals 7 4 21 2/1

Table Tutorial

3rd Down Targets – Season Totals

Name Targets Catches Yards FD/TD
Witten 4 4 52 3/1
Crayton 4 1 4 0/0
Choice 3 3 9 1/0
Williams 2 0 0 0/0
Bennett 2 0 0 0/0
Totals 15 8 65 4/1

Table Tutorial

SACKS

Here, we keep track of sacks all season. So far, pass protection has not been an issue at all. But, trust me, this is a long season. we will need this chart, too.

Anyway, we will continue to update this chart as the season goes on:

Week Opponent Sack Blame
Wk 1 Tampa Barber 9?

Table Tutorial

Bookmark and Share
15 Comments to “Football 301: Decoding Garrett – Week 2”
  • Xanthippas

    Great analysis. Thanks.

  • chuckmallott

    Keep up the good work, Bob. I’d be lost without you! :) Loving the integration of video with your analysis, too. Awesome!

  • WacoGreg

    Good stuff, Brian is making your job way too easy here though. Keep up the good work Brian.

  • steven Hecht

    The question that needs to be asked is why does Jason Garrett insist on throwing the ball the first two downs (the second of which was intercepted) right after we ran the ball down their throats for 84 yards in four rushes?

    Why won’t he let the OL try to dominate a game, and a team, by rushing the ball. Run the ball to throw, not the other way around.

    It just sickens me to see this every game. The Boys have a huge line, the Giants have a small DL, let’s cram it down their throats and NOT Stop!

  • Chris

    It basically comes down to both Romo and Garrett are impatient. They are always trying to hit a big play. On the pick returned for a touchdown, Romo actually has Austin on a shallow slant that he has a chance to run for a few yard. Maybe even make a first down if Austin breaks a tackle.

    On the deep shot to Hurd, it was an impatient play call followed with a QB who thinks the same way and doesn’t want to play safe. I was sitting in the upperlevel and I saw the safety back way up and wondered what he was doing. As soon as I saw the play fake, I had the “Oh, S!” moment. I could see what was happening, and it was genius on the Giants part.

    Garrett and Romo both have tendencies, and I’m not sure this thing goes anywhere until some of those tendencies change. They are working on it I am sure, and it is a long season, but they need to change quick. We need to stockpile wins because it might be tough to make the playoffs in the NFC this year if you don’t win the division.

  • selke99

    Bob, I think Coughlin in his post game comments alluded to them playing the pass and not letting Romo and the big play beat them, like they did against TB the week before. That might have been why the running game worked so well and Romo wasn’t really rushed all night. We’ll see if Carolina stacks the line to play the run and test Romo.

    Chris, nothing is wrong with calling that deep ball to Hurd. It’s on 1st down, if it’s not there, throw it away and run on 2nd down. What happened to the checkdowns to the RBs Romo/Garrett used to have 2 years ago that worked so well? This would have worked great if Gmen are covering everyone downfield. Romo takes so much time (like Peyton) calling audibles/fake audibles that there is no excuse for not seeing that safety.

  • Chris

    Selke, I disagree with you on the call to Hurd. I think if you are a coach/playcaller, you’ve got to know your players and put them in a position to succeed (or not fail). Garrett has to know that Romo might try to force the pass because of his nature. Therefore, take it out of his hands if the ground game is working. Besides, keeping it on the ground takes the game into the 4th quarter. In theory, they could possibly go up 2 scores and take the clock down to the 10-12 minute range.

  • just me

    Decode Wade next week. Defense sucks.

  • selke99

    Chris, I understand the run is working, but you can’t expect the offense to not call any passes all game or take any deep shots to keep the defense honest. Again, it’s on first down, so you can still run on second. If the OC is afraid that his QB is going to throw into double coverage and not call those plays, you don’t have a good QB. Romo was supposed to work on that all offseason. It’s easy to second guess now and say run on that play. But there’s nothing wrong with taking shots once in a while.

  • Chris

    I’m not saying don’t call pass plays the rest of the game. But what I am saying is that they had a chance to take control of the game. When you have a chance to do that against a quality opponent, in your home opener with all the hoopla and whatnot, you have to make sure you get the job done. Those types of opportunities in situations like where the game was at that point don’t present themself often, and the Cowboys didn’t get the job done.

    Sure, a bomb over the top, if successful, is a great looking play and makes the crowd go crazy and extends the lead, but there is the chance you get a bad throw, or your receiver trips, or the DB makes a play, etc. Keep running the ball, and if you want to throw, keep it safe, over the middle, run the clock. Heck, run a screen pass or two. Get your running backs in space. Play ball control and get your points. The Giants defense is on its heels. The 90′s teams, that Garrett was on, would have pounded the Giants into submission at that point.

    I see what you are saying about second guessing after the fact. My point is that it is time for this team to move from second guess moments to playing consistent, winning football.

  • selke99

    Chris, I agree that they should have kept running the ball overall. But you mention a bomb could leave to a bad throw, WR trip, etc…Those things could happen on any throw, short, medium, or long. They had run the ball to get close to midfield before the INT. My point was that it’s good to take 2-3 shots downfield (especially when defense is expecting run), but it’s a QB’s job to not throw into double coverage! Plus, if Romo had seen Phillips waaaaay back at safety, maybe he should have audibled out of that playcall or looked for a closer target. The middle of the field should have been wide open.

    How come we are not seeing:

    1. Screen/swing passes to Felix. In this year’s offense, this play should be near the top of the list.

    2. Romo rolling out. He was so successful in this. I wonder what the heck Garrett is thinking when he looks at film of what works.

  • Chris

    Selke, I agree with what you are saying. It just frustrates me that Garrett has forgotten the lessons he learned as a part of the 90s Cowboys. At that spot in the game, he should have tried to control the ball, the clock, and gotten his points. A bomb over the top gets you points if it hits, but at the same time, you don’t run any more clock, you put your defense back on the field right away, and you don’t wear down the Giants defense any more.

    But we could go round and round on this debate forever. I agree with your 2 points about passes to Felix and getting Romo on the move. While you can’t argue that Garrett’s offense puts up points, I think one can be critical of how he calls a game, and how Romo executes it. I’ve always been a huge supporter of both, but doubts are starting to creep in.

  • Chupacabra

    Chris and Selke, I understand both points. I understand why Garrett called that play, IF Romo had not made any prior mistakes in the game. You are at midfield, and have been pounding them with the run – seemingly a good time for play-action home run.

    BUT, given that Romo had already thrown two INTs in the game, 1 bad decision and 1 terrible pass (off Witten’s hand/foot) – Garrett should have played it safe and managed the game.

    1 troubling trend on both INTs. Both times the Giants only rushed 4, and dropped 7 in coverage. Both times, Romo doesn’t check down and come off his primary receiver. Especially with the last INT – look at the time he has to step up in the pocket. He has to be smarter and more patient.

  • Chris

    The thing that concerns me about Romo is that he is in 3rd full season as a starter, but he is 29 yrs old. He seems to be making the same mistakes that a 24-25 yr old QB would be making. My worry is that by the time he fully matures as a decision maker, he’ll be into his 30s and some of the physical skills will start to leave him. It is those skills that make him who he is as a player. I think there is a window on the time that he can be great, and while I think it is still open, it is not as great a time period as a Matt Ryan or Flacco.

  • Football 301: Decoding Garrett – Week 5

    [...] the domination on the ground with the “22″ package. This is exactly what the Cowboys did during Week 2 against the New York Giants when they ran 10 running plays for 121 yards. This week, they gashed the Kansas City Chiefs on 7 [...]